* refactor(workflows): extract discuss-phase modes/templates/advisor for progressive disclosure (closes#2551)
Splits 1,347-line workflows/discuss-phase.md into a 495-line dispatcher plus
per-mode files in workflows/discuss-phase/modes/ and templates in
workflows/discuss-phase/templates/. Mirrors the progressive-disclosure
pattern that #2361 enforced for agents.
- Per-mode files: power, all, auto, chain, text, batch, analyze, default, advisor
- Templates lazy-loaded at the step that produces the artifact (CONTEXT.md
template at write_context, DISCUSSION-LOG.md template at git_commit,
checkpoint.json schema when checkpointing)
- Advisor mode gated behind `[ -f $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/USER-PROFILE.md ]`
— inverse of #2174's --advisor flag (don't pay the cost when unused)
- scout_codebase phase-type→map selection table extracted to
references/scout-codebase.md
- New tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs enforces tiered budgets across
all workflows/*.md (XL=1700 / LARGE=1500 / DEFAULT=1000) plus the
explicit <500 ceiling for discuss-phase.md per #2551
- Existing tests updated to read from the new file locations after the
split (functional equivalence preserved — content moved, not removed)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(#2607): align modes/auto.md check_existing with parent (Update it, not Skip)
CodeRabbit flagged drift between the parent step (which auto-selects "Update
it") and modes/auto.md (which documented "Skip"). The pre-refactor file had
both — line 182 said "Skip" in the overview, line 250 said "Update it" in the
actual step. The step is authoritative. Fix the new mode file to match.
Refs: PR #2607 review comment 3127783430
* test(#2607): harden discuss-phase regression tests after #2551 split
CodeRabbit identified four test smells where the split weakened coverage:
- workflow-size-budget: assertion was unreachable (entered if-block on match,
then asserted occurrences === 0 — always failed). Now unconditional.
- bug-2549-2550-2552: bounded-read assertion checked concatenated source, so
src.includes('3') was satisfied by unrelated content in scout-codebase.md
(e.g., "3-5 most relevant files"). Now reads parent only with a stricter
regex. Also asserts SCOUT_REF exists.
- chain-flag-plan-phase: filter(existsSync) silently skipped a missing
modes/chain.md. Now fails loudly via explicit asserts.
- discuss-checkpoint: same silent-filter pattern across three sources. Now
asserts each required path before reading.
Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783457, 3127783452, plus nitpicks for
chain-flag-plan-phase.test.cjs:21-24 and discuss-checkpoint.test.cjs:22-27
* docs(#2607): fix INVENTORY count, context.md placeholders, scout grep portability
- INVENTORY.md: subdirectory note said "50 top-level references" but the
section header now says 51. Updated to 51.
- templates/context.md: footer hardcoded XX-name instead of declared
placeholders [X]/[Name], which would leak sample text into generated
CONTEXT.md files. Now uses the declared placeholders.
- references/scout-codebase.md: no-maps fallback used grep -rl with
"\\|" alternation (GNU grep only — silent on BSD/macOS grep). Switched
to grep -rlE with extended regex for portability.
Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783404, 3127783448, plus nitpick for
scout-codebase.md:32-40
* docs(#2607): label fenced examples + clarify overlay/advisor precedence
- analyze.md / text.md / default.md: add language tags (markdown/text) to
fenced example blocks to silence markdownlint MD040 warnings flagged by
CodeRabbit (one fence in analyze.md, two in text.md, five in default.md).
- discuss-phase.md: document overlay stacking rules in discuss_areas — fixed
outer→inner order --analyze → --batch → --text, with a pointer to each
overlay file for mode-specific precedence.
- advisor.md: add tie-breaker rules for NON_TECHNICAL_OWNER signals — explicit
technical_background overrides inferred signals; otherwise OR-aggregate;
contradictory explanation_depth values resolve by most-recent-wins.
Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783415, 3127783437, plus nitpicks for
default.md:24, discuss-phase.md:345-365, and advisor.md:51-56
* fix(#2607): extract codebase_drift_gate body to keep execute-phase under XL budget
PR #2605 added 80 lines to execute-phase.md (1622 -> 1702), pushing it over
the XL_BUDGET=1700 line cap enforced by tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs
(introduced by this PR). Per the test's own remediation hint and #2551's
progressive-disclosure pattern, extract the codebase_drift_gate step body to
get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase/steps/codebase-drift-gate.md and leave
a brief pointer in the workflow. execute-phase.md is now 1633 lines.
Budget is NOT relaxed; the offending workflow is tightened.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Documents that only agents/ at the repo root is tracked by git.
.claude/agents/, .cursor/agents/, and .github/agents/ are gitignored
install-sync outputs and must not be edited — they will be overwritten.
Closes#2365
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Node 22 is still in Active LTS until October 2026 and Maintenance LTS
until April 2027. Raising the engines floor to >=24.0.0 unnecessarily
locked out a fully-supported LTS version and produced EBADENGINE
warnings on install. Restore Node 22 support, add Node 22 to the CI
matrix, and update CONTRIBUTING.md to match.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Node 20 reached EOL April 30 2026. Node 22 is no longer the LTS
baseline — Node 24 is the current Active LTS. Update CI matrix to
run only Node 24, raise engines floor to >=24.0.0, and update
CONTRIBUTING.md node compatibility table accordingly.
Fixes#1847
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add close-draft-prs.yml workflow that auto-closes draft PRs with
explanatory comment directing contributors to submit completed PRs
- Update CONTRIBUTING.md with "No draft PRs" policy
- Update default PR template with draft PR warning
Closes#1762
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Overhaul CONTRIBUTING.md and all GitHub issue/PR templates to enforce a
structured, approval-gated contribution process that cuts down on drive-by
feature submissions.
Changes:
- CONTRIBUTING.md: add Types of Contributions section defining Fix,
Enhancement, and Feature with escalating requirements and explicit
rejection criteria; add Issue-First Rule section making clear that
enhancements require approved-enhancement and features require
approved-feature label before any code is written; backport gsd-2
testing standards (t.after() per-test cleanup, array join() fixture
pattern, Node 24 as primary CI target, test requirements by change type,
reviewer standards)
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/enhancement.yml: new template requiring current
vs. proposed behavior, reason/benefit narrative, full scope of changes,
and breaking changes assessment; cannot be clicked through
- .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml: full rewrite requiring solo-
developer problem statement, what is being added, full file-level scope,
user stories, acceptance criteria, maintenance burden assessment, and
alternatives considered; incomplete specs are closed, not revised
- .github/pull_request_template.md: converted from general template to a
routing page directing contributors to the correct typed template;
using the default template for a feature or enhancement is a rejection
reason
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/fix.md: new typed template requiring
confirmed-bug label on linked issue and regression test confirmation
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/enhancement.md: new typed template with
hard gate on approved-enhancement label and scope confirmation section
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/feature.md: new typed template requiring
file inventory, spec compliance checklist from the issue, and scope
confirmation that nothing beyond the approved spec was added
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- PR template: move "Closes #" to top as required field with explicit
warning that PRs without a linked issue are closed without review
- CONTRIBUTING.md: add mandatory issue-first policy with clear rationale
- Add require-issue-link.yml workflow: checks PR body for a closing
keyword (Closes/Fixes/Resolves #NNN) on open/edit/reopen/sync events;
posts a comment and fails CI if no reference is found
PR body is bound to an env var before shell use (injection-safe).
The github-script step uses the API SDK, not shell interpolation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Test suite modernization:
- Converted all try/finally cleanup patterns to beforeEach/afterEach hooks
across 11 test files (core, copilot-install, config, workstream,
milestone-summary, forensics, state, antigravity, profile-pipeline,
workspace)
- Consolidated 40 inline mkdtempSync calls to use centralized helpers
- Added createTempDir() helper for bare temp directories
- Added optional prefix parameter to createTempProject/createTempGitProject
- Fixed config test HOME sandboxing (was reading global defaults.json)
New CONTRIBUTING.md:
- Test standards: hooks over try/finally, centralized helpers, HOME sandboxing
- Node 22/24 compatibility requirements with Node 26 forward-compat
- Code style, PR guidelines, security practices
- File structure overview
All 1382 tests pass, 0 failures.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add GitHub Actions CI for cross-platform testing (ubuntu/windows/macos × node 18/20/22)
- Add release workflow that auto-creates GitHub Releases and publishes to npm on tag push
- Add CONTRIBUTING.md with branching strategy (maintainers direct commit, contributors PR)
- Add MAINTAINERS.md with release workflows and recovery procedures
- Add PR template for contributors
Closes#221
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>