mirror of
https://github.com/glittercowboy/get-shit-done
synced 2026-04-25 17:25:23 +02:00
* test: destroy 9 config-schema.cjs/core.cjs source-grep tests, add behavioral config-set tests (#2691, #2693)
Replace source-grep theater with config-set behavioral tests:
- execute-phase-wave: config-set workflow.use_worktrees replaces VALID_CONFIG_KEYS grep
- inline-plan-threshold: delete redundant source-grep (behavioral test at L36 already covered it)
- plan-bounce: config-set for plan_bounce / plan_bounce_script / plan_bounce_passes replaces 3 key-presence greps
- code-review: config-set for code_review / code_review_depth replaces 2 greps; removes CONFIG_PATH constant
- thinking-partner: config-set features.thinking_partner replaces two greps (config-schema.cjs AND core.cjs)
Behavioral tests survive refactors (no path constants, no file reads). The config-schema.cjs →
core.cjs migration commit 990c3e64 happened because these tests groped source paths.
Add allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product annotations to legitimate product-content tests:
autonomous-allowed-tools, agent-frontmatter, agent-skills-awareness, bug-2334, bug-2346,
execute-phase-wave (MD reads), plan-bounce (workflow reads). Annotations explain WHY text
inspection is the right level of testing for AI instruction files.
Closes #2691
Closes #2693
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test: address CodeRabbit findings on #2696
- agent-frontmatter.test.cjs: move allow-test-rule annotation from block comment
to standalone // line comment so rule scanners can detect it
- thinking-partner.test.cjs: strengthen config-set test with config-get read-back
assertion to verify the value was persisted, not just accepted (exit 0)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test: tighten thinking_partner config assertion per CodeRabbit (#2696)
Replace config-get output substring check (includes('true') false-positive
risk) with a direct JSON read of .planning/config.json, asserting the
exact persisted value via strictEqual. This also validates the config file
was created, catching silent key-acceptance without persistence.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
122 lines
4.4 KiB
JavaScript
122 lines
4.4 KiB
JavaScript
/**
|
|
* Tests for workflow.inline_plan_threshold config key and routing logic (#1979).
|
|
*
|
|
* Verifies:
|
|
* 1. The config key is accepted by config-set (VALID_CONFIG_KEYS contains it)
|
|
* 2. The key is documented in planning-config.md
|
|
* 3. The execute-plan.md routing instruction uses the correct grep pattern
|
|
* (matches <task at any indentation, since PLAN.md templates differ)
|
|
* 4. The workflow guards threshold=0 to disable inline routing
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe, beforeEach, afterEach } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
|
const path = require('node:path');
|
|
const { runGsdTools, createTempProject, cleanup } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
|
|
|
const repoRoot = path.resolve(__dirname, '..');
|
|
const executePlanPath = path.join(repoRoot, 'get-shit-done', 'workflows', 'execute-plan.md');
|
|
const planningConfigPath = path.join(repoRoot, 'get-shit-done', 'references', 'planning-config.md');
|
|
|
|
describe('inline_plan_threshold config key (#1979)', () => {
|
|
let tmpDir;
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
tmpDir = createTempProject();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
afterEach(() => {
|
|
cleanup(tmpDir);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('config-set accepts workflow.inline_plan_threshold', () => {
|
|
const result = runGsdTools('config-set workflow.inline_plan_threshold 3', tmpDir);
|
|
assert.ok(result.success, `config-set should accept workflow.inline_plan_threshold: ${result.error}`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('config-set accepts threshold=0 to disable inline routing', () => {
|
|
const result = runGsdTools('config-set workflow.inline_plan_threshold 0', tmpDir);
|
|
assert.ok(result.success, `config-set should accept 0: ${result.error}`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('planning-config.md documents workflow.inline_plan_threshold', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(planningConfigPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
content,
|
|
/workflow\.inline_plan_threshold/,
|
|
'planning-config.md must document workflow.inline_plan_threshold'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('execute-plan.md routing instruction (#1979)', () => {
|
|
test('grep pattern matches <task at any indentation level', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(executePlanPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
|
|
// The new pattern should use \s* for leading whitespace, not ^ anchor alone
|
|
// Must match both "<task type=" (unindented) and " <task type=" (indented)
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
content,
|
|
/TASK_COUNT=\$\(grep -cE '\^\\s\*<task/,
|
|
'grep pattern must allow any leading whitespace before <task'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('inline routing is guarded by INLINE_THRESHOLD > 0', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(executePlanPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
content,
|
|
/INLINE_THRESHOLD\s*>\s*0.*TASK_COUNT\s*<=\s*INLINE_THRESHOLD/s,
|
|
'inline routing must be guarded by INLINE_THRESHOLD > 0 so threshold=0 disables it'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('grep pattern does NOT use ^<task alone (would miss indented tasks)', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(executePlanPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
// The old buggy pattern: grep -c "^<task" with no whitespace allowance
|
|
const buggyPattern = /grep -c "\^<task"/;
|
|
assert.doesNotMatch(
|
|
content,
|
|
buggyPattern,
|
|
'must not use the buggy "^<task" pattern which misses indented tasks'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('grep pattern matches real-world indented task formats', () => {
|
|
// Simulate how the grep pattern would behave against sample PLAN.md content
|
|
// Extract the pattern from execute-plan.md
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(executePlanPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
const patternMatch = content.match(/TASK_COUNT=\$\(grep -cE '([^']+)'/);
|
|
assert.ok(patternMatch, 'must find TASK_COUNT grep pattern');
|
|
|
|
const regexSource = patternMatch[1].replace(/\\s/g, '\\s').replace(/\[\[:space:\]>\]/, '[\\s>]');
|
|
const re = new RegExp(regexSource, 'gm');
|
|
|
|
// Test cases: should match all of these as single tasks
|
|
const samples = [
|
|
'<task type="auto">',
|
|
' <task type="auto">',
|
|
' <task type="checkpoint:decision">',
|
|
'\t<task type="auto">',
|
|
];
|
|
for (const sample of samples) {
|
|
const matches = sample.match(re);
|
|
assert.ok(matches && matches.length > 0, `Pattern must match: ${JSON.stringify(sample)}`);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Non-task lines should not match
|
|
const nonMatches = [
|
|
'<tasks>',
|
|
'</task>',
|
|
'// <task comment',
|
|
];
|
|
for (const sample of nonMatches) {
|
|
const matches = sample.match(re);
|
|
assert.ok(!matches || matches.length === 0, `Pattern must NOT match: ${JSON.stringify(sample)}`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
});
|