mirror of
https://github.com/glittercowboy/get-shit-done
synced 2026-04-25 17:25:23 +02:00
Removes the .next-call-count counter file guard (which fired on clean usage and missed real incomplete work) and replaces it with a scan of all prior phases for plans without summaries, unoverridden VERIFICATION.md failures, and phases with CONTEXT.md but no plans. When gaps are found, shows a structured report with Continue/Stop/Force options; the Continue path writes a formal 999.x backlog entry and commits it before routing. Clean projects route silently with no interruption. Closes #2089 Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
187 lines
6.7 KiB
JavaScript
187 lines
6.7 KiB
JavaScript
/**
|
|
* GSD Tools Tests - /gsd-next safety gates and prior-phase completeness scan
|
|
*
|
|
* Validates that the next workflow includes three hard-stop safety gates
|
|
* (checkpoint, error state, verification), a prior-phase completeness scan
|
|
* replacing the old consecutive-call counter, and a --force bypass flag.
|
|
*
|
|
* Closes: #1732, #2089
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
|
|
describe('/gsd-next safety gates (#1732, #2089)', () => {
|
|
const workflowPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'get-shit-done', 'workflows', 'next.md');
|
|
const commandPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'commands', 'gsd', 'next.md');
|
|
|
|
test('workflow contains safety_gates step', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('<step name="safety_gates">'),
|
|
'workflow should have a safety_gates step'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('safety_gates step appears between detect_state and determine_next_action', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
const detectIdx = content.indexOf('name="detect_state"');
|
|
const gatesIdx = content.indexOf('name="safety_gates"');
|
|
const routeIdx = content.indexOf('name="determine_next_action"');
|
|
assert.ok(detectIdx > -1, 'detect_state step should exist');
|
|
assert.ok(gatesIdx > -1, 'safety_gates step should exist');
|
|
assert.ok(routeIdx > -1, 'determine_next_action step should exist');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
detectIdx < gatesIdx && gatesIdx < routeIdx,
|
|
'safety_gates must appear between detect_state and determine_next_action'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('Gate 1: unresolved checkpoint (.continue-here.md)', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('.continue-here.md'),
|
|
'Gate 1 should check for .planning/.continue-here.md'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Unresolved checkpoint'),
|
|
'Gate 1 should display "Unresolved checkpoint" message'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('Gate 2: error state in STATE.md', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('status: error') || content.includes('status: failed'),
|
|
'Gate 2 should check for error/failed status in STATE.md'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Project in error state'),
|
|
'Gate 2 should display "Project in error state" message'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('Gate 3: unchecked verification failures', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('VERIFICATION.md'),
|
|
'Gate 3 should check VERIFICATION.md'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('FAIL'),
|
|
'Gate 3 should look for FAIL items'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Unchecked verification failures'),
|
|
'Gate 3 should display "Unchecked verification failures" message'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('prior-phase completeness scan replaces consecutive-call counter', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Prior-phase completeness scan'),
|
|
'workflow should have a prior-phase completeness scan section'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!content.includes('.next-call-count'),
|
|
'workflow must not reference the old .next-call-count counter file'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!content.includes('consecutively'),
|
|
'workflow must not reference consecutive call counting'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('completeness scan checks plans without summaries', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Plans without summaries') || content.includes('no SUMMARY.md'),
|
|
'completeness scan should detect plans that ran without producing summaries'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('completeness scan checks verification failures in prior phases', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Verification failures not overridden') ||
|
|
content.includes('VERIFICATION.md with `FAIL`'),
|
|
'completeness scan should detect unoverridden FAIL items in prior phase VERIFICATION.md'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('completeness scan checks CONTEXT.md without plans', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('CONTEXT.md without plans') ||
|
|
content.includes('CONTEXT.md but no PLAN.md'),
|
|
'completeness scan should detect phases with discussion but no planning'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('completeness scan offers Continue, Stop, and Force options', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('[C]'), 'completeness scan should offer [C] Continue option');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('[S]'), 'completeness scan should offer [S] Stop option');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('[F]'), 'completeness scan should offer [F] Force option');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('deferral path creates backlog entry using 999.x scheme', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('999.'),
|
|
'deferral should use the 999.x backlog numbering scheme'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Backlog') || content.includes('BACKLOG'),
|
|
'deferral should write to the Backlog section of ROADMAP.md'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('clean prior phases route silently with no interruption', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('silently') || content.includes('no interruption'),
|
|
'workflow should route without interruption when prior phases are clean'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('--force flag bypasses all gates', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('--force'),
|
|
'workflow should document --force flag'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('skipping safety gates'),
|
|
'workflow should print warning when --force is used'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command definition documents --force flag and completeness scan', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(commandPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('--force'),
|
|
'command definition should mention --force flag'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('bypass safety gates'),
|
|
'command definition should explain that --force bypasses safety gates'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('completeness'),
|
|
'command definition should document the prior-phase completeness scan'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('gates exit on first hit', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Exit on first hit'),
|
|
'safety gates should exit on first hit'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|