mirror of
https://github.com/glittercowboy/get-shit-done
synced 2026-04-25 17:25:23 +02:00
* refactor(workflows): extract discuss-phase modes/templates/advisor for progressive disclosure (closes #2551) Splits 1,347-line workflows/discuss-phase.md into a 495-line dispatcher plus per-mode files in workflows/discuss-phase/modes/ and templates in workflows/discuss-phase/templates/. Mirrors the progressive-disclosure pattern that #2361 enforced for agents. - Per-mode files: power, all, auto, chain, text, batch, analyze, default, advisor - Templates lazy-loaded at the step that produces the artifact (CONTEXT.md template at write_context, DISCUSSION-LOG.md template at git_commit, checkpoint.json schema when checkpointing) - Advisor mode gated behind `[ -f $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/USER-PROFILE.md ]` — inverse of #2174's --advisor flag (don't pay the cost when unused) - scout_codebase phase-type→map selection table extracted to references/scout-codebase.md - New tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs enforces tiered budgets across all workflows/*.md (XL=1700 / LARGE=1500 / DEFAULT=1000) plus the explicit <500 ceiling for discuss-phase.md per #2551 - Existing tests updated to read from the new file locations after the split (functional equivalence preserved — content moved, not removed) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2607): align modes/auto.md check_existing with parent (Update it, not Skip) CodeRabbit flagged drift between the parent step (which auto-selects "Update it") and modes/auto.md (which documented "Skip"). The pre-refactor file had both — line 182 said "Skip" in the overview, line 250 said "Update it" in the actual step. The step is authoritative. Fix the new mode file to match. Refs: PR #2607 review comment 3127783430 * test(#2607): harden discuss-phase regression tests after #2551 split CodeRabbit identified four test smells where the split weakened coverage: - workflow-size-budget: assertion was unreachable (entered if-block on match, then asserted occurrences === 0 — always failed). Now unconditional. - bug-2549-2550-2552: bounded-read assertion checked concatenated source, so src.includes('3') was satisfied by unrelated content in scout-codebase.md (e.g., "3-5 most relevant files"). Now reads parent only with a stricter regex. Also asserts SCOUT_REF exists. - chain-flag-plan-phase: filter(existsSync) silently skipped a missing modes/chain.md. Now fails loudly via explicit asserts. - discuss-checkpoint: same silent-filter pattern across three sources. Now asserts each required path before reading. Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783457, 3127783452, plus nitpicks for chain-flag-plan-phase.test.cjs:21-24 and discuss-checkpoint.test.cjs:22-27 * docs(#2607): fix INVENTORY count, context.md placeholders, scout grep portability - INVENTORY.md: subdirectory note said "50 top-level references" but the section header now says 51. Updated to 51. - templates/context.md: footer hardcoded XX-name instead of declared placeholders [X]/[Name], which would leak sample text into generated CONTEXT.md files. Now uses the declared placeholders. - references/scout-codebase.md: no-maps fallback used grep -rl with "\\|" alternation (GNU grep only — silent on BSD/macOS grep). Switched to grep -rlE with extended regex for portability. Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783404, 3127783448, plus nitpick for scout-codebase.md:32-40 * docs(#2607): label fenced examples + clarify overlay/advisor precedence - analyze.md / text.md / default.md: add language tags (markdown/text) to fenced example blocks to silence markdownlint MD040 warnings flagged by CodeRabbit (one fence in analyze.md, two in text.md, five in default.md). - discuss-phase.md: document overlay stacking rules in discuss_areas — fixed outer→inner order --analyze → --batch → --text, with a pointer to each overlay file for mode-specific precedence. - advisor.md: add tie-breaker rules for NON_TECHNICAL_OWNER signals — explicit technical_background overrides inferred signals; otherwise OR-aggregate; contradictory explanation_depth values resolve by most-recent-wins. Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783415, 3127783437, plus nitpicks for default.md:24, discuss-phase.md:345-365, and advisor.md:51-56 * fix(#2607): extract codebase_drift_gate body to keep execute-phase under XL budget PR #2605 added 80 lines to execute-phase.md (1622 -> 1702), pushing it over the XL_BUDGET=1700 line cap enforced by tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs (introduced by this PR). Per the test's own remediation hint and #2551's progressive-disclosure pattern, extract the codebase_drift_gate step body to get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase/steps/codebase-drift-gate.md and leave a brief pointer in the workflow. execute-phase.md is now 1633 lines. Budget is NOT relaxed; the offending workflow is tightened. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
209 lines
8.2 KiB
JavaScript
209 lines
8.2 KiB
JavaScript
const { describe, test } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
|
|
const GSD_ROOT = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'get-shit-done');
|
|
|
|
describe('Thinking Partner Integration (#1726)', () => {
|
|
// Reference doc tests
|
|
describe('Reference document', () => {
|
|
const refPath = path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'references', 'thinking-partner.md');
|
|
|
|
test('thinking-partner.md exists', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(refPath), 'references/thinking-partner.md should exist');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('documents all 3 integration points', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('### 1. Discuss Phase'), 'should document Discuss Phase integration');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('### 2. Plan Phase'), 'should document Plan Phase integration');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('### 3. Explore'), 'should document Explore integration');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('documents keyword tradeoff signals', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('"or"'), 'should list "or" as keyword signal');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('"versus"'), 'should list "versus" as keyword signal');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('"tradeoff"'), 'should list "tradeoff" as keyword signal');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('"pros and cons"'), 'should list "pros and cons" as keyword signal');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('"torn between"'), 'should list "torn between" as keyword signal');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('documents structural tradeoff signals', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('2+ competing options'), 'should list competing options signal');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('which is better'), 'should list "which is better" signal');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('reverses a previous decision'), 'should list decision reversal signal');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('documents when NOT to activate', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('When NOT to activate'), 'should document non-activation cases');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('already made a clear choice'), 'should mention clear choices');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('feature is opt-in with default false', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('Default: `false`'), 'should document default as false');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('opt-in'), 'should describe feature as opt-in');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('documents design principles', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('Lightweight'), 'should list Lightweight principle');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('Opt-in'), 'should list Opt-in principle');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('Skippable'), 'should list Skippable principle');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('Brief'), 'should list Brief principle');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('Aligned'), 'should list Aligned principle');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('explore integration deferred to #1729', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(refPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('#1729'), 'should reference issue #1729 for explore integration');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Config tests
|
|
describe('Config integration', () => {
|
|
test('features.thinking_partner is in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS', () => {
|
|
const configSrc = fs.readFileSync(
|
|
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'bin', 'lib', 'config-schema.cjs'),
|
|
'utf-8'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
configSrc.includes("'features.thinking_partner'"),
|
|
'VALID_CONFIG_KEYS should contain features.thinking_partner'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('features is in KNOWN_TOP_LEVEL section containers', () => {
|
|
const coreSrc = fs.readFileSync(
|
|
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'bin', 'lib', 'core.cjs'),
|
|
'utf-8'
|
|
);
|
|
// The KNOWN_TOP_LEVEL set should include 'features' in section containers
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
coreSrc.includes("'features'"),
|
|
'KNOWN_TOP_LEVEL should contain features as a section container'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Workflow integration tests
|
|
// After #2551 progressive-disclosure refactor, the thinking-partner block
|
|
// moved into the per-mode files (default.md, advisor.md) since the prompt
|
|
// is mode-specific (only fires inside discuss_areas, after a user answer).
|
|
describe('Discuss-phase integration', () => {
|
|
function readDiscussFamily() {
|
|
const candidates = [
|
|
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'discuss-phase.md'),
|
|
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'discuss-phase', 'modes', 'default.md'),
|
|
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'discuss-phase', 'modes', 'advisor.md'),
|
|
];
|
|
return candidates
|
|
.filter(p => fs.existsSync(p))
|
|
.map(p => fs.readFileSync(p, 'utf-8'))
|
|
.join('\n');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test('discuss-phase.md contains thinking partner conditional block', () => {
|
|
const content = readDiscussFamily();
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Thinking partner (conditional)'),
|
|
'discuss-phase workflow family should contain thinking partner conditional block'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('discuss-phase references features.thinking_partner config', () => {
|
|
const content = readDiscussFamily();
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('features.thinking_partner'),
|
|
'discuss-phase workflow family should reference the config key'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('discuss-phase references thinking-partner.md for signal list', () => {
|
|
const content = readDiscussFamily();
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('references/thinking-partner.md'),
|
|
'discuss-phase workflow family should reference the signal list doc'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('discuss-phase offers skip option', () => {
|
|
const content = readDiscussFamily();
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('No, decision made'),
|
|
'discuss-phase workflow family should offer a skip/decline option'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('Plan-phase integration', () => {
|
|
test('plan-phase.md contains thinking partner conditional block', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(
|
|
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md'),
|
|
'utf-8'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Thinking partner for architectural tradeoffs (conditional)'),
|
|
'plan-phase.md should contain thinking partner conditional block'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plan-phase references features.thinking_partner config', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(
|
|
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md'),
|
|
'utf-8'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('features.thinking_partner'),
|
|
'plan-phase.md should reference the config key'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plan-phase scans for architectural tradeoff keywords', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(
|
|
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md'),
|
|
'utf-8'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('"architecture"'),
|
|
'plan-phase.md should list architecture as a keyword'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('"approach"'),
|
|
'plan-phase.md should list approach as a keyword'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('"alternative"'),
|
|
'plan-phase.md should list alternative as a keyword'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plan-phase offers skip option', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(
|
|
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md'),
|
|
'utf-8'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes("No, I'll decide"),
|
|
'plan-phase.md should offer a skip/decline option'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plan-phase block is between step 11 and step 12', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(
|
|
path.join(GSD_ROOT, 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md'),
|
|
'utf-8'
|
|
);
|
|
const step11Idx = content.indexOf('## 11. Handle Checker Return');
|
|
const thinkingIdx = content.indexOf('Thinking partner for architectural tradeoffs');
|
|
const step12Idx = content.indexOf('## 12. Revision Loop');
|
|
assert.ok(step11Idx < thinkingIdx, 'thinking partner block should come after step 11');
|
|
assert.ok(thinkingIdx < step12Idx, 'thinking partner block should come before step 12');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|