Replace 30 absorbed/deleted standalone command forms with their consolidated flag-based equivalents across 25 files (English + 4 locales + AGENTS/CLI-TOOLS/CONFIGURATION): /gsd-session-report → /gsd-pause-work --report /gsd-list-phase-assumptions → /gsd-discuss-phase --assumptions /gsd-analyze-dependencies → /gsd-manager --analyze-deps /gsd-research-phase → /gsd-plan-phase --research-phase /gsd-plan-milestone-gaps → /gsd-audit-milestone /gsd-code-review-fix → /gsd-code-review --fix /gsd-spike-wrap-up → /gsd-spike --wrap-up /gsd-sketch-wrap-up → /gsd-sketch --wrap-up /gsd-set-profile → /gsd-config --profile /gsd-check-todos → /gsd-capture --list /gsd-add-todo → /gsd-capture /gsd-add-backlog → /gsd-capture --backlog /gsd-plant-seed → /gsd-capture --seed /gsd-note → /gsd-capture --note /gsd-add-phase → /gsd-phase /gsd-insert-phase → /gsd-phase --insert /gsd-edit-phase → /gsd-phase --edit /gsd-remove-phase → /gsd-phase --remove /gsd-new-workspace → /gsd-workspace --new /gsd-list-workspaces → /gsd-workspace --list /gsd-remove-workspace → /gsd-workspace --remove /gsd-sync-skills → /gsd-update --sync /gsd-reapply-patches → /gsd-update --reapply /gsd-scan → /gsd-map-codebase --fast /gsd-intel → /gsd-map-codebase --query /gsd-next → /gsd-progress --next /gsd-do → /gsd-progress --do /gsd-status → /gsd-progress /gsd-join-discord → /gsd-help Skipped: CHANGELOG, RELEASE notes, superpowers/specs (historical) Suite: 6971/6971 pass
9.3 KiB
Issue-Driven Orchestration with GSD
Status: stable workflow guide Audience: developers who track work in GitHub Issues, Linear, Jira, or similar issue trackers and want to drive AI-assisted implementation through GSD's existing primitives.
What this guide is
A recipe for combining commands GSD already ships into an issue-tracker → workspace → plan/execute → verify/review → PR loop. It is documentation only. No new commands, no daemon, no tracker integration — every command referenced below already exists in GSD today.
The shape is inspired by OpenAI's open-source Symphony orchestration reference (repository). GSD does not vendor or wrap Symphony. The orchestration concepts map cleanly onto primitives GSD already exposes; this guide just spells the mapping out so you can adopt the pattern without writing glue code or bypassing GSD's safety gates.
Why this exists
GSD has the building blocks for issue-driven AI development —
/gsd-workspace --new, /gsd-manager, /gsd-autonomous, /gsd-verify-work,
/gsd-review, /gsd-ship, plus STATE.md and the phase artifact suite
— but no guide that walks through how to drive them from a single tracker
issue without writing custom orchestration scripts. Without that guide
the failure modes are:
- Underuse: developers run discuss/plan/execute manually and never reach
for
/gsd-manageror/gsd-autonomouseven when their work pattern fits. - Workaround scripts: developers wire ad-hoc shell loops between their
tracker and
claudeinvocations, bypassingSTATE.md, the phase manifest, and the verification gates.
This guide makes the canonical loop discoverable.
Concept mapping
Each row maps a Symphony-style orchestration concept to the GSD primitive that already serves it. Use this table as a translation key when reading Symphony docs, blog posts, or third-party orchestration write-ups.
| Symphony concept | GSD primitive |
|---|---|
WORKFLOW.md (top-level intent) |
ROADMAP.md (project intent), STATE.md (live status), phase CONTEXT.md (per-phase scope), phase PLAN.md (executable steps) |
| One isolated agent workspace per task | /gsd-workspace --new --strategy worktree |
| Agent dispatch and concurrency | /gsd-manager (interactive dashboard), /gsd-autonomous (unattended) |
| Per-phase plan and discuss steps | /gsd-discuss-phase → /gsd-plan-phase → /gsd-execute-phase |
| Proof-of-work / test evidence | /gsd-verify-work (UAT.md persisted across /clear) |
| Adversarial review | /gsd-review (cross-AI peer review of plans) |
| Human merge gate | /gsd-ship (creates PR, optional code review, prepares merge) |
| Follow-up capture | /gsd-note, /gsd-capture --seed, /gsd-new-milestone, or a manually opened tracker issue |
| Concurrency control | Manager / background-agent semantics (no always-on poller) |
The mapping is one-way: GSD owns the safety gates (verification, human review, explicit confirmation for follow-up creation). Symphony's "continuous orchestration" framing is intentionally not adopted — see Non-goals.
End-to-end flow
The canonical issue → PR loop, written so it can run from a single tracker issue end-to-end. Replace bracketed placeholders before running.
- Pick the tracker issue. Choose one issue from your tracker (GitHub, Linear, etc.) that is well-scoped enough for autonomous implementation — bounded scope, observable acceptance criteria, no upstream dependencies that block execution.
- Map to a GSD phase. If the issue maps onto an existing phase in
ROADMAP.md, select it. If not, run/gsd-new-milestone(for a new milestone of related issues) or open a phase via/gsd-phase//gsd-phase --insert. Capture the tracker issue URL in the phase'sCONTEXT.mdso traceability survives compaction. - Create an isolated workspace. Run
/gsd-workspace --new --strategy worktree <slug>to spin up a git worktree with an independent.planning/directory. The worktree is the safety boundary: any exploration, partial commits, or aborted plans stay outsidemain. - Run discuss → plan → execute through GSD. From inside the
workspace, run
/gsd-discuss-phaseto clarify ambiguities,/gsd-plan-phaseto producePLAN.md, and either/gsd-manager(interactive dashboard) or/gsd-execute-phase//gsd-autonomous(unattended) to implement. Avoid driving rawclaudeinvocations from outside GSD — that bypassesSTATE.mdupdates and the phase manifest. - Demand proof-of-work. Run
/gsd-verify-workto walk the user through UAT against the phase's acceptance criteria. Tests, screenshots, log captures, and config diffs are all recorded inUAT.md, which persists across/clearand feeds gaps into/gsd-plan-phase --gapswhen verification surfaces missed scope. - Pass through the review and ship gates. Run
/gsd-reviewto get adversarial peer review of the plan from independent AI CLIs (catches blind spots model-by-model), then/gsd-shipto open the PR with a rich body assembled from the planning artifacts. Both gates require a human decision before anything reaches the remote. - Capture follow-up work explicitly. Use
/gsd-notefor inline notes,/gsd-capture --seedfor ideas worth a future phase, or/gsd-new-milestonefor a coherent group of follow-ups. Creating a tracker issue from a discovered follow-up requires explicit user confirmation — GSD does not post to remote trackers automatically.
When the PR merges, the loop closes. Auto-close keywords in the PR body
(Closes #NNN / Fixes #NNN) close the tracker issue at merge time.
Safety boundaries
The loop is safe because four invariants hold by construction:
- Isolated worktrees. Every issue runs in a
/gsd-workspace --newworktree, so partial work, aborted plans, and exploratory commits never touchmain.gsd-local-patches/is the recovery surface if a worktree's hand-edits need to come back across an update. - Explicit human review.
/gsd-reviewand/gsd-shipboth stop for human approval. There is no auto-merge and no auto-PR-from-execution path. If you want to remove the human gate for a specific repository, that is your branch-protection / merge-queue policy decision, not something GSD opts into for you. - No automatic public posting. GSD never opens, comments on, or closes a tracker issue without an explicit user-initiated command. Follow-up capture defaults to local artifacts (notes, seeds, milestones); pushing back to the tracker is a separate manual step.
- Verification before ship.
/gsd-verify-work's UAT.md must record evidence before/gsd-shipis run. The recommended discipline is to treatverification_failedas a blocker even when the implementation looks correct — the failure usually surfaces a missed acceptance criterion, not a flaky test.
If any of these invariants is bypassed (e.g. running claude directly
against the worktree, skipping /gsd-verify-work, or scripting issue
creation through the tracker API without user confirmation), the
guarantees of this guide do not apply.
Non-goals
This guide deliberately does not propose any of the following. They are listed here so future contributors don't re-litigate them in code review:
- No vendoring or copying Symphony code. GSD reuses its own primitives. The mapping above is conceptual; no Symphony-derived source ships in this repo.
- No long-running daemon. GSD does not poll GitHub or Linear. The manager and autonomous workflows handle concurrency through background-agent semantics, not a daemon.
- No mandatory tracker dependency. The loop works without any
tracker integration. The "tracker issue" step is a human input —
the URL goes into
CONTEXT.md. GSD has no opinion about which tracker you use, or whether you use one at all. - No bypass of verification, review, or human decision gates. Even
when running
/gsd-autonomous, the verification and review gates still fire. The "autonomous" label refers to phase-to-phase progression, not to skipping human approval. - No expansion of the default skill / command surface. Every command referenced in this guide already exists. This guide is a documentation surface, not a feature surface.
Possible future follow-up
If maintainer experience with this loop justifies it, a separate approved-enhancement could later add a minimal tracker bridge:
- Importing one GitHub or Linear issue into a GSD workspace / phase.
- Exporting
UAT.mdevidence as a comment on the source issue. - Generating follow-up tracker issues from
/gsd-capture --seedoutput.
Each of those would be its own enhancement proposal because each adds integration surface and ongoing maintenance burden. They are out of scope for this guide.
Related
- docs/USER-GUIDE.md — task-oriented walkthroughs of individual commands referenced above.
- docs/COMMANDS.md — full reference for
/gsd-*commands. - docs/FEATURES.md — feature-level capability matrix (workspaces, manager, autonomous, verify, review, ship).
- docs/ARCHITECTURE.md — phase-artifact lifecycle
and
STATE.mdmechanics.