mirror of
https://github.com/glittercowboy/get-shit-done
synced 2026-04-26 01:35:29 +02:00
* refactor(tests): standardize to node:assert/strict and t.after() per CONTRIBUTING.md
- Replace require('node:assert') with require('node:assert/strict') across
all 73 test files to enforce strict equality (no type coercion)
- Replace try/finally cleanup blocks with t.after() hooks in core.test.cjs
and hooks-opt-in.test.cjs per the test lifecycle standards
- Utility functions in codex-config and security-scan retain try/finally
as that is appropriate for per-function resource guards, not lifecycle hooks
Closes #1674
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* perf(tests): add --test-concurrency=4 to test runner for parallel file execution
Node.js --test-concurrency controls how many test files run as parallel child
processes. Set to 4 by default, configurable via TEST_CONCURRENCY env var.
Fixes tests at a known level rather than inheriting os.availableParallelism()
which varies across CI environments.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(security): allowlist verify.test.cjs in prompt-injection scanner
tests/verify.test.cjs uses <human>...</human> as GSD phase task-type
XML (meaning "a human should verify this step"), which matches the
scanner's fake-message-boundary pattern for LLM APIs. This is a
false positive — add it to the allowlist alongside the other test files
that legitimately contain injection-adjacent patterns.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
158 lines
6.6 KiB
JavaScript
158 lines
6.6 KiB
JavaScript
/**
|
|
* Tests for bug #1587: parallel agents for dependent plans
|
|
*
|
|
* Validates that:
|
|
* 1. gsd-planner.md assign_waves step explicitly checks files_modified overlap
|
|
* and mandates a later wave for any plan that shares files with a prior plan.
|
|
* 2. execute-phase.md has a pre-spawn intra-wave files_modified overlap check
|
|
* and directs sequential execution when overlap is detected.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
|
|
const PLANNER_AGENT_PATH = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'agents', 'gsd-planner.md');
|
|
const EXECUTE_PHASE_PATH = path.join(
|
|
__dirname,
|
|
'..',
|
|
'get-shit-done',
|
|
'workflows',
|
|
'execute-phase.md'
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// gsd-planner.md — wave assignment must account for files_modified overlap
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('gsd-planner agent: files_modified wave ordering', () => {
|
|
test('planner agent file exists', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(PLANNER_AGENT_PATH), 'agents/gsd-planner.md should exist');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('assign_waves step checks files_modified overlap', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(PLANNER_AGENT_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
// The assign_waves step must mention files_modified overlap as a wave-bumping condition
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('files_modified'),
|
|
'assign_waves step should reference files_modified'
|
|
);
|
|
// Must state that overlap forces a later wave (not just "same plan or sequential")
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('files_modified overlap') ||
|
|
content.includes('files_modified') &&
|
|
(content.includes('later wave') || content.includes('strictly later wave')),
|
|
'assign_waves step should explicitly require a later wave when files_modified overlap exists'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('assign_waves step contains explicit overlap → later-wave rule', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(PLANNER_AGENT_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
// Look for the assign_waves step block
|
|
const assignWavesMatch = content.match(
|
|
/<step name="assign_waves">([\s\S]*?)<\/step>/
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(assignWavesMatch, 'assign_waves step should exist in gsd-planner.md');
|
|
|
|
const stepContent = assignWavesMatch[1];
|
|
|
|
// Must mention files_modified as a wave-ordering factor inside the step
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
stepContent.includes('files_modified'),
|
|
'assign_waves step body must reference files_modified as a wave-assignment factor'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('assign_waves step treats files_modified overlap same as depends_on dependency', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(PLANNER_AGENT_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
const assignWavesMatch = content.match(
|
|
/<step name="assign_waves">([\s\S]*?)<\/step>/
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(assignWavesMatch, 'assign_waves step should exist');
|
|
|
|
const stepContent = assignWavesMatch[1];
|
|
|
|
// The step must bump the wave when files_modified overlap exists
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
stepContent.includes('overlap') || stepContent.includes('shared file'),
|
|
'assign_waves step must handle file overlap as a wave-bumping condition'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('planner has validation step or quality gate for wave/files_modified consistency', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(PLANNER_AGENT_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
// Either a validation step or the quality_gate checklist must assert no same-wave overlap
|
|
const hasValidationStep =
|
|
content.includes('validate_waves') ||
|
|
content.includes('wave_validation') ||
|
|
content.includes('files_modified overlap');
|
|
const hasQualityGateCheck =
|
|
content.includes('files_modified') && content.includes('same wave');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
hasValidationStep || hasQualityGateCheck,
|
|
'planner should validate that no two plans in the same wave share files_modified entries'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// execute-phase.md — pre-spawn intra-wave overlap safety net
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
describe('execute-phase workflow: intra-wave files_modified overlap check', () => {
|
|
test('execute-phase workflow file exists', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(EXECUTE_PHASE_PATH), 'workflows/execute-phase.md should exist');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('execute_waves step contains intra-wave files_modified overlap check', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(EXECUTE_PHASE_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
// The workflow must mention checking files_modified overlap before spawning
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('files_modified') &&
|
|
(content.includes('overlap') || content.includes('intra-wave')),
|
|
'execute-phase workflow should check for files_modified overlap within a wave before spawning'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('overlap detection is placed before agent spawning', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(EXECUTE_PHASE_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
// Overlap check keyword must appear before the Task( spawn call
|
|
const overlapIdx = content.indexOf('intra-wave') !== -1
|
|
? content.indexOf('intra-wave')
|
|
: content.indexOf('files_modified overlap');
|
|
const spawnIdx = content.indexOf('Spawn executor agents');
|
|
assert.ok(overlapIdx !== -1, 'overlap check text should exist in execute-phase.md');
|
|
assert.ok(spawnIdx !== -1, '"Spawn executor agents" heading should exist');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
overlapIdx < spawnIdx,
|
|
'overlap check should appear before the "Spawn executor agents" section'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('workflow warns and switches to sequential when overlap detected', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(EXECUTE_PHASE_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
// Must log a warning and force sequential execution for overlapping plans
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('sequentially') || content.includes('sequential'),
|
|
'workflow should direct sequential execution when overlap is detected'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('overlap') && content.includes('warn'),
|
|
'workflow should log a warning when files_modified overlap is detected in a wave'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('overlap check covers all plans in the wave, not just adjacent pairs', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(EXECUTE_PHASE_PATH, 'utf-8');
|
|
// Must describe comparing all plans in the wave (set-intersection language)
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('all plans in') ||
|
|
content.includes('all plans within') ||
|
|
content.includes('each pair') ||
|
|
content.includes('any two plans'),
|
|
'overlap check should cover all plan pairs in the wave, not just adjacent ones'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|