mirror of
https://github.com/glittercowboy/get-shit-done
synced 2026-04-25 17:25:23 +02:00
41dc475c46
* refactor(workflows): extract discuss-phase modes/templates/advisor for progressive disclosure (closes #2551) Splits 1,347-line workflows/discuss-phase.md into a 495-line dispatcher plus per-mode files in workflows/discuss-phase/modes/ and templates in workflows/discuss-phase/templates/. Mirrors the progressive-disclosure pattern that #2361 enforced for agents. - Per-mode files: power, all, auto, chain, text, batch, analyze, default, advisor - Templates lazy-loaded at the step that produces the artifact (CONTEXT.md template at write_context, DISCUSSION-LOG.md template at git_commit, checkpoint.json schema when checkpointing) - Advisor mode gated behind `[ -f $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/USER-PROFILE.md ]` — inverse of #2174's --advisor flag (don't pay the cost when unused) - scout_codebase phase-type→map selection table extracted to references/scout-codebase.md - New tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs enforces tiered budgets across all workflows/*.md (XL=1700 / LARGE=1500 / DEFAULT=1000) plus the explicit <500 ceiling for discuss-phase.md per #2551 - Existing tests updated to read from the new file locations after the split (functional equivalence preserved — content moved, not removed) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2607): align modes/auto.md check_existing with parent (Update it, not Skip) CodeRabbit flagged drift between the parent step (which auto-selects "Update it") and modes/auto.md (which documented "Skip"). The pre-refactor file had both — line 182 said "Skip" in the overview, line 250 said "Update it" in the actual step. The step is authoritative. Fix the new mode file to match. Refs: PR #2607 review comment 3127783430 * test(#2607): harden discuss-phase regression tests after #2551 split CodeRabbit identified four test smells where the split weakened coverage: - workflow-size-budget: assertion was unreachable (entered if-block on match, then asserted occurrences === 0 — always failed). Now unconditional. - bug-2549-2550-2552: bounded-read assertion checked concatenated source, so src.includes('3') was satisfied by unrelated content in scout-codebase.md (e.g., "3-5 most relevant files"). Now reads parent only with a stricter regex. Also asserts SCOUT_REF exists. - chain-flag-plan-phase: filter(existsSync) silently skipped a missing modes/chain.md. Now fails loudly via explicit asserts. - discuss-checkpoint: same silent-filter pattern across three sources. Now asserts each required path before reading. Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783457, 3127783452, plus nitpicks for chain-flag-plan-phase.test.cjs:21-24 and discuss-checkpoint.test.cjs:22-27 * docs(#2607): fix INVENTORY count, context.md placeholders, scout grep portability - INVENTORY.md: subdirectory note said "50 top-level references" but the section header now says 51. Updated to 51. - templates/context.md: footer hardcoded XX-name instead of declared placeholders [X]/[Name], which would leak sample text into generated CONTEXT.md files. Now uses the declared placeholders. - references/scout-codebase.md: no-maps fallback used grep -rl with "\\|" alternation (GNU grep only — silent on BSD/macOS grep). Switched to grep -rlE with extended regex for portability. Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783404, 3127783448, plus nitpick for scout-codebase.md:32-40 * docs(#2607): label fenced examples + clarify overlay/advisor precedence - analyze.md / text.md / default.md: add language tags (markdown/text) to fenced example blocks to silence markdownlint MD040 warnings flagged by CodeRabbit (one fence in analyze.md, two in text.md, five in default.md). - discuss-phase.md: document overlay stacking rules in discuss_areas — fixed outer→inner order --analyze → --batch → --text, with a pointer to each overlay file for mode-specific precedence. - advisor.md: add tie-breaker rules for NON_TECHNICAL_OWNER signals — explicit technical_background overrides inferred signals; otherwise OR-aggregate; contradictory explanation_depth values resolve by most-recent-wins. Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783415, 3127783437, plus nitpicks for default.md:24, discuss-phase.md:345-365, and advisor.md:51-56 * fix(#2607): extract codebase_drift_gate body to keep execute-phase under XL budget PR #2605 added 80 lines to execute-phase.md (1622 -> 1702), pushing it over the XL_BUDGET=1700 line cap enforced by tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs (introduced by this PR). Per the test's own remediation hint and #2551's progressive-disclosure pattern, extract the codebase_drift_gate step body to get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase/steps/codebase-drift-gate.md and leave a brief pointer in the workflow. execute-phase.md is now 1633 lines. Budget is NOT relaxed; the offending workflow is tightened. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
--power mode — bulk question generation, async answering
Lazy-loaded. Read this file from
workflows/discuss-phase.mdwhen--poweris present in$ARGUMENTS. The full step-by-step instructions live in the existingdiscuss-phase-power.mdworkflow file (kept stable at its original path so installed@-references continue to resolve).
Dispatch
Read @~/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/discuss-phase-power.md
Execute it end-to-end. Do not continue with the standard interactive steps.
Summary of flow
The power user mode generates ALL questions upfront into machine-readable and human-friendly files, then waits for the user to answer at their own pace before processing all answers in a single pass.
- Run the same phase analysis (gray area identification) as standard mode
- Write all questions to
{phase_dir}/{padded_phase}-QUESTIONS.jsonand{phase_dir}/{padded_phase}-QUESTIONS.html - Notify user with file paths and wait for a "refresh" or "finalize" command
- On "refresh": read the JSON, process answered questions, update stats and HTML
- On "finalize": read all answers from JSON, generate CONTEXT.md in the standard format
When to use
Large phases with many gray areas, or when users prefer to answer questions offline / asynchronously rather than interactively in the chat session.
Combination rules
--power --auto: power wins. Power mode is incompatible with autonomous selection — its purpose is offline answering.--power --chain: after the power-mode finalize step writes CONTEXT.md, the chain auto-advance still applies (Readchain.md).