When an element's ID is removed we only want to remove it from
`m_potentially_named_elements` if it is not also considered a
potentially named element due to it's name content attribute.
While width and height are presentational hints on canvas, they actually
map to the CSS aspect-ratio attribute, not to CSS width and height.
For this reason, we actually need to manually mark for relayout here.
Also import a WPT test that was flaky before this change.
This implements the previously stubbed out `report_validity` method.
The specification is not very clear on how to exactly report the
validity. For now, we bring the first visible invalid control into
view and focus it. In the future, however, it would make sense to
support more complex scenarios and be more aligned with the other
implementations.
Importing these tests now because they are for input-element types that
have requirements related to the constraint-validation API — which we’ve
been implementing recently.
This commit only imports tests, without any changes to our code.
Type changes are now signaled to radio buttons. This causes other radio
buttons in the group to be unchecked if the input element is a checked
radio button after the type change.
similar-origin window agents have the [[CanBlock]] flag set to false.
Achieve this by hooking up JS's concept with an agent to HTML::Agent.
For now, this is only hooked up to the similar-origin window agent
case but should be extended to the other agent types in the future.
This change adds “default step” and “step scale factor” handling for all
remaining HTMLInputElement input types for which the spec defines such
and that we didn’t yet have handling for.
Previously, we would only invalidate style when setting the `media` IDL
attribute; changing the attribute via `setAttribute()` and
`removeAttribute()` had no immediate effect.
This change fixes a bug in our implementation of the “step base”
algorithm at https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-input-min-zero. We
were using the “value” IDL/DOM attribute in a particular step, where the
spec instead actually requires using the “value” content attribute.
This change — part of the HTML constraint-validation API (aka
“client-side form validation”) — implements the willValidate IDL/DOM
attribute/property for all form controls that support it.
Corresponds to part of https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9841 and then
https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/11047
Adding `Auto` as a type state feels a little odd, as it's not an actual
type allowed in HTML. However, it's the default state when the value is
missing or invalid, which works out the same, as long as we never
serialize "auto", which we don't.
Since we don't support the "variant" meta tag stuff in WPT, I've simply
copied the test files here, and then test.js looks at the filename to
figure out which test function to use.
This incrases our coverage of the HTML parser substantially by also
invoking it via document.write() one-shot, and character-at-a-time.
This fixes a crash in the included test that regressed in 0adf261,
and is hit by the following HTML:
```html
<body></body>
<script>
const frame = document.body.appendChild(document.createElement("iframe"));
frame.contentDocument.open();
const child = frame.contentDocument.createElement("html")
const html = frame.contentDocument.appendChild(child);
frame.contentDocument.close();
</script>
```
I am not 100% sure this is fully the correct fix and there are other
cases which would not work properly. But it's definitely an improvement
to make the confuisingly named 'insert_an_eof' function of the tokenizer
actually do something.
This commit begins to implement the track processing model. When the
`src` attribute is updated, we now fetch the given source file.
Currently, we always fire an `error` event once fetching is completed,
as we don't support processing the fetched data.
Instead of always reporting a colno and lineno of zero try and use the
values from the Error object that may be provided, falling back to the
source location of the invocation if not provided. We can definitely
improve the reporting even more, but this is a start!
Also update this function to latest spec while we're in the area.
