This parses `anchor-size(..)` functions in CSS, but does not yet result
in a useful `Size`: we need style & layout interleaving similar to
container queries for this, since the resulting value depends on layout
results.
Not supported yet: `anchor-size()` appearing inside a `calc()` node.
Adds 4280 WPT subtest passes in `css/css-anchor-position`.
...for `text-justify: inter-character`.
We previously had this mapped in Enums.json, but the behaviour is
different: `a=b` in Enums.json keeps `a` around but makes it behave the
same as `b`. A legacy name alias is instead expected to replace `a`
with `b`, so we have to do that separately.
We now do the proper thing in terms of:
- Allowing percentages
- Returning the computed value in getComputedStyle
- Handling values out of the [0,1] range
Gains us 13 WPT passes in the imported tests.
When setting a declaration for a property in a logical property group,
it should appear after all other declarations which belong to the same
property group but have different mapping logic (are/aren't a logical
alias).
Gains us 1 WPT pass.
We were previously handling this ad-hoc via logic in
`get_property_internal` but this didn't cover all contexts (for
instance `CSSStyleProperties::serialized`.
Gains us 9 more WPT tests as we now cover properties which weren't
included in the previous ad-hoc approach.
Previously, we would allow calc values such as `calc(min(1 2))`, which
would be simplified to `calc(3)` because we assumed that numbers not
separated by an operator represented a sum. We now validate that the
number of operators we see is as we would expect before collecting
these values into a sum node.
Previously we would never get a valid `consistent_type` as we were
trying to make the node types consistent with the initial empty type
which isn't possible.
Gains us 7 WPT tests.
Previously we would incorrectly map these in
`CSSStyleProperties::convert_declarations_to_specified_order`, aside
from being too early (as it meant we didn't maintain them as distinct
from their physical counterparts in CSSStyleProperties), this meant
that we didn't yet have the required context to map them correctly.
We now map them as part of the cascade process. To compute the mapping
context we do a cascade without mapping, and extract the relevant
properties (writing-direction and direction).
When we try to insert a disallowed (non-nested) statement into a
CSSGroupingRule we should throw a `HierarchyRequestError` as it being
disallowed is a "constraint specified by CSS". Previously we would rely
on `Parser::is_valid_in_the_current_context` and throw a Syntax error.
There are more constraints to be implemented.
