Some subtests changed in response to this CSSWG resolution:
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11494#issuecomment-2675800489
Basically, `border-style: none` now affects the used value of
`border-width`, not the computed value. (And the same for `outline`
properties.)
This affects way more tests than I expected because
interpolation-testcommon.js now adds tests for composition.
Previously we would only update these if:
a) We had a cascaded value for `transition-property`
b) The source of that cascaded value had changed since we last
registered transitions
This meant that there were a lot of changes we didn't apply:
- Changes exclusively to properties other than `transition-property`
(e.g. `transition-duration`, `transition-behavior`, etc)
- Removing the `transition-property` property
- Updating the `transition-property` property in a way that didn't
change it's source (e.g. setting it within inline-style)
Unfortunately this does mean that we now register transitions for all
properties on most elements since "all" is the initial value for
"transition-property" which isn't great for performance, but that can be
looked at in later commits.
If either of the two transform functions during interpolation is a 3D
function, both of them get coerced to a 3D function before deciding what
to do next. However, we only supported converting 2D functions to 3D if
they had a 2D primitive they could be converted to first.
Change our behavior to default to converting to matrix3d() if there is
no explicit conversion path. Fixes a crash in
`css/css-transforms/animation/transform-interpolation-004.html`.
We had a partial implementation of transformation function interpolation
that did not support numerical interpolation of simple functions (e.g.
`scale(0)` -> `scale(1)`). This refactors the interpolation to follow
the spec more closely.
Gains us 267 WPT subtest passes in `css/css-transforms`.
Fixes#6774.
In several content calculation methods in FormattingContext, we assumed
that if create_independent_formatting_context_if_needed() fails the
input Layout::Box is a BlockContainer; however, the web platform test
css/css-pseudo/parsing/marker-supported-properties-in-animation.html is
one scenario where the input is a Layout::ListItemMarkerBox instead and
there is no FormattingContext supported for it yet.
Doing trigonometric calculations with floating point numbers can
introduce small inaccuracies. This meant that we would sometimes
incorrectly generate a 3d rather than 2d matrix for the resolved value
of `transform`.
Gains us 3 WPT tests.
Shorthands should be broken up into their longhands, instead of setting
them directly.
There's a catch here with our "positional value list shorthands" like
`margin`: Setting margin to a single value like `CSSUnitValue(10, "px")`
is supposed to fail here, but our type-checking code thinks it's valid
because our JSON for `margin` says it accepts lengths. This is the same
kind of issue that we had for `cursor` discussed in the
"LibWeb/CSS: Support converting CSSUnitValue to a StyleValue" commit.
Will get us a few subtest passes for every shorthand that's tested.
Previously we would always use the window's viewport which was incorrect
if we were within an iframe.
This is likely applicable to all uses of
`Length::ResolutionContext::for_window`.
