Previously we would generate the calculation context based on the
current value parsing context. The main problem with this was that
contexts were defined per property by default and had to be overriden
per component value using "special" contexts, which was easy to forget.
We now generate the calculation context per component value in the
relevant `parse_foo_value` methods.
The new failures in `typed_arithmetic.html` are because we no longer
treat percentages as resolving to their property-level type when
computing what the resolved type of a calculation is i.e. when we are
parsing the `<number>` portion of `line-height` we treat percentages as
raw percentages, not lengths. This brings us in line with WebKit but no
longer with Chrome and WPT, I am not sure what the correct behavior is.
Previously, the LibWeb bindings generator would output multiple per
interface files like Prototype/Constructor/Namespace/GlobalMixin
depending on the contents of that IDL file.
This complicates the build system as it means that it does not know
what files will be generated without knowledge of the contents of that
IDL file.
Instead, for each IDL file only generate a single Bindings/<IDLFile>.h
and Bindings/<IDLFile>.cpp.
DOMMatrix.to_string() throws exceptions if any of its values are
non-finite. This ends up affecting CSSStyleValue because its subclass
CSSTransformValue (which is about to be added) serializes
CSSTransformComponents, and one of those is CSSMatrixComponent, which
calls DOMMatrix.to_string().
This is all quite unfortunate, and because at the time the spec for
DOMMatrix was written, CSS couldn't represent NaN or infinity. That's
no longer true, so I'm hoping the spec can be updated and this can be
reverted. https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/611
Reifying the result gets quite ad-hoc. Firstly because "parse a
component value" produces a ComponentValue, not a full StyleValue like
we need for math functions. And second, because not all math functions
can be reified as a CSSNumericValue:
Besides the fact that I haven't implemented CalculatedStyleValue
reification at all yet, there are a lot of math functions with no
corresponding CSSMathValue in the spec yet. If the calculation tree
contains any of those, the best we can do is reify as a CSSStyleValue,
and that isn't a valid return value from CSSNumericValue.parse(). So, I
made us throw a SyntaxError in those cases. This seems to match
Chrome's behaviour. Spec issue:
https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/1090
