Inline nodes in our layout tree have a position, so let's show it. By
centralizing the logic for this, block nodes now lose their redundant
'content-size' dump info which is already part of the box model dump.
When traversing the layout tree to find an appropriate box child to
derive the baseline from. Only the child's margin and offset was being
applied. Now we sum each offset on the recursive call.
This is a part of refactoring towards making the paintable tree
independent of the layout tree. Now, instead of transferring text
fragments from the layout tree to the paintable tree during the layout
commit phase, we allocate separate PaintableFragments that contain only
the information necessary for painting. Doing this also allows us to
get rid LineBoxes, as they are used only during layout.
When modifying the button layout during tree building to use flex for
vertical alignment, let's explicitly set the button box's children to
be non-inline. It doesn't make sense to layout the button as an IFC
when its only child is a flex container.
Using flex layout inside button solves the issue with wrongly calculated
height when it has: pseudo element and whitespaces inside.
Also using flex instead of a table layout allows for the same vertical
alignment but with fewer layout nodes: a flex container and anonymous
wrapper for content instead of a table wrapper, table, row, and cell.
We were relying on the table fixup algorithm to insert the missing table
row, which fails to do so when we only have an image in the button.
While that might be a problem with the table fixup algorithm, we should
build a correct layout tree explicitly anyway.
Fixes crashes on GitHub.
