`grid-template-rows: fit-content(100px)` had no effect when the grid
container lacked an explicit height, because the fit-content growth
limit clamping was gated behind `available_size.is_definite()`.
Fix by normalizing fit-content tracks with unresolvable percentage
arguments to max-content during track initialization, then applying
the fit-content clamp unconditionally.
Fixes https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/issues/7730
Previously, has_scrollable_overflow was a purely geometric check, true
whenever content extended beyond the padding box regardless of the
overflow property. This caused unnecessary scroll frame allocation for
boxes with `overflow:visible`.
Per CSS Overflow 3, scrollable overflow is only defined for scroll
containers (overflow: auto/hidden/scroll). Gate the flag on
`is_scroll_container()` so that only actual scroll containers get scroll
frames assigned.
For grid items with auto preferred size, stretch/normal alignment, and
no auto margins, the final size is simply the containing block size
minus margin box sizes. We can compute this directly without calling
`calculate_fit_content_width/height`, which triggers expensive intrinsic
sizing layout passes.
This patch fixes an issue where grid items using `grid-area: <name>`
with no matching named grid area or lines would be incorrectly placed
at position 0.
According to https://www.w3.org/TR/css-grid-1/#line-placement:
1. When a `<custom-ident>` doesn't match any named line, placement
should fall back to the first implicit grid line
2. When the same `<custom-ident>` is given for both `grid-*-start` and
`grid-*-end` (which happens with `grid-area: name`), and both fall
back to the same implicit line, the resulting span is 1
Previously, the fallback values were hardcoded to 0 and 1, which placed
items in track 0. The fix changes the fallback to use
`m_explicit_line_count` (the first implicit line index) for both start
and end identifiers. When both reference the same line (start == end),
the existing "both positioned" logic now handles this by setting span=1
and adjusting end accordingly.
Use `calculate_inner_height()` and `calculate_inner_width()`, which
account for box-sizing, to resolve the item's size in max-content
contribution calculations.
Previously, we were collapsing whitespace in Layout::TextNode and then
passed the resulting string for further processing through ChunkIterator
-> InlineLevelIterator -> InlineFormattingContext -> LineBuilder ->
LineBoxFragment -> PaintableFragment. Our painting tree is where we deal
with things like range offsets into the underlying text nodes, but since
we modified the original string, the offsets were wrong.
This changes the way we generate fragments:
* Layout::TextNode no longer collapses whitespace as part of its
stored "text for rendering", but moves this logic to ChunkIterator
which splits up this text into separate views whenever whitespace
needs to be collapsed.
* Layout::LineBox now only extends the last fragment if its end offset
is equal to the new fragment's start offset. Otherwise, there's a
gap caused by collapsing whitespace and we need to generate a
separate fragment for that in order to have a correct start offset.
Some tests need new baselines because of the fixed start offsets.
Fixes#566.
This change removes premature reset of
`block_container_y_position_update_callback`. Also makes callback
private in `BlockMarginState`, because resetting it independently of
currently accumulated margins is incorrect.
Lots of test expectations are updated, but there is no visual
difference.
Fixes https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/issues/6074
Inline nodes in our layout tree have a position, so let's show it. By
centralizing the logic for this, block nodes now lose their redundant
'content-size' dump info which is already part of the box model dump.
...by another GFC. When searching for grid item that contains an
abspos box positioned relative to GFC, it's incorrect to assume that the
closest ancestor box whose parent establishes GFC is always the one we
are looking for, because there may be non-positioned GFC in between.
Fixes regression introduced in 80c8e78.
Before this change, `layout_absolutely_positioned_element()` in GFC
had an assumption that all contained by grid container abspos boxes were
also direct children of the grid container. This change adds handling
for the cases when it's not true and, in order to identify grid area
abspos box belongs to, we have to find ancestor grid item.
CSS grid specification states that for grid items with a replaced
element and a percentage preferred size or maximum size, the percentage
should be resolved against 0 during content-based minimum size
calculation. This makes sense, as it prevents replaced items from
overshooting their grid track while intrinsic track sizes are
calculated, and allows later track size resolution steps to scale
replaced items to fit their grid track.
We were always creating an anonymous container for the inline contents
of table cells, but the layout node we spawn for the table cells
themselves already is capable of dealing with inline nodes. Regular
logic should kick in for dealing with the block/inline node invariant.
Whenever we end up with a scrollable overflow rect that goes beyond
either of its axes (i.e. the rect has a negative X or Y position
relative to its parent's absolute padding box position), we need to clip
that rect to prevent going into the "unreachable scrollable overflow".
This fixes the horizontal scrolling on https://ladybird.org (gets more
pronounced if you make the window very narrow).
By the time we calculate the min-content height, the width is already
known, so we can use it to calculate the height based on the natural
aspect ratio.
Browsers such as Chrome and Firefox apply an arbitrary scale to the
current font size if `normal` is used for `line-height`. Firefox uses
1.2 while Chrome uses 1.15. Let's go with the latter for now, it's
relatively easy to change if we ever want to go back on that decision.
This also requires updating the expectations for a lot of layout tests.
The upside of this is that it's a bit easier to compare our layout
results to other browsers', especially Chrome.
It's safe to remove this pointer because intrinsic layout should never
look up a box's state beyond its containing block.
This change affects the expectations of two layout tests, but both
already differ slightly from other browsers, and the difference between
expectations is less than 5px.
With this change we no longer stretch "width: auto" for replaced
elements and also use "width calculation rules for block-level replaced
elements", like suggested by the spec.
Instead of directly invoking `to_px()`,
`calculate_min_content_contribution()` needs to use
`calculate_inner_width()` and `calculate_inner_height()`, which are
aware of how to correctly handle `min-content` and `max-content` values.
Fixes https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/issues/3469
This fixes an issue where CSS vertical-align on a table-cell box would
incorrectly apply to both the table-cell box and any inline content it
had inside.
By the time we're measuring the height of a BFC root, we've already
collapsed all relevant margins for the root and its descendants.
Given this, we should simply use 0 (relative to the BFC root) as the
lowest block axis coordinate (i.e Y value) for the margin edges.
This fixes a long-standing issue where BFC roots were sometimes not tall
enough to contain their children due to margins.
This improves the quality of our font rendering, especially when
animations are involved. Relevant changes:
* Skia fonts have their subpixel flag set, which means that individual
glyphs are rendered at subpixel offsets causing glyph runs as a
whole to look better.
* Fragment offsets are no longer rounded to whole device pixels, and
instead the floating point offset is kept. This allows us to pass
through the floating point baseline position all the way to the Skia
calls, which already expected that to be a float position.
The `scrollable-contains-table.html` ref test needed different table
headings since they would slightly inflate the column size in the test
file, but not the reference.
compute_inset() was incorrectly retrieving the containing block size
because containing_block() is unaware of grid areas that form a
containing block for grid items but do not exist in the layout tree.
With this change, we explicitly pass the containing block into
compute_inset(), allowing it to correctly provide the containing block
sizes for grid items.
- Include vertical border spacing in row group offset calculation so
that they are axis-aligned with child row/cell elements. This makes it
so there isn't horizontal and vertical overflow caused by child
row/cell elements.
- Include horizontal border spacing in tr width calculations. This makes
it so tr elements don't have overflow anymore when there are multiple
columns.
- Apply vertical caption offset to row group top offset.
- Don't double-count top padding when calculating vertical offset for
tr and row groups.
- Add support for placement of abspos items into track formed by last
line and padding edge of grid container
- Correctly handle auto-positioned abspos items by placing them between
padding edges of grid container
Fixes crashing on https://wpt.live/css/css-grid/abspos/positioned-grid-descendants-001.html
..and delay static position calculation in IFC until trailing
whitespace are removed, because otherwise it's not possible to correctly
calculate x offset.
Containing block for abspos grid items depends on their grid placement:
- if element has definite grid position, then corresponding grid area
should be used as a containing block
- if element does not have definite grid position, then padding edge of
grid container should be used as a containing block
So offset should be adjusted for paddings only for boxes without
definite grid position.
The `calculate_inner_width()` and `calculate_inner_height()` resolve
percentage paddings using the width returned by
`containing_block_width_for()`. However, this function does not account
for grids where the containing block is defined by the grid area to
which an item belongs.
This change fixes the issue by modifying `calculate_inner_width()` and
`calculate_inner_height()` to use the already resolved paddings from the
layout state. Corresponding changes ensure that paddings are resolved
and saved in the state before box-sizing is handled.
As a side effect, this change also improves abspos layout for BFC where
now paddings are resolved using padding box of containing block instead
of content box of containing block.
