Instead of computing and caching the transform matrix and transform
origin on PaintableBox during resolve_paint_properties(), compute them
inline during assign_accumulated_visual_contexts() where they are
actually consumed. This makes PaintableBox smaller by not wasting space
for properties that are only consumed during AccumulatedVisualContext
tree construction.
Previously, has_scrollable_overflow was a purely geometric check, true
whenever content extended beyond the padding box regardless of the
overflow property. This caused unnecessary scroll frame allocation for
boxes with `overflow:visible`.
Per CSS Overflow 3, scrollable overflow is only defined for scroll
containers (overflow: auto/hidden/scroll). Gate the flag on
`is_scroll_container()` so that only actual scroll containers get scroll
frames assigned.
Inline nodes in our layout tree have a position, so let's show it. By
centralizing the logic for this, block nodes now lose their redundant
'content-size' dump info which is already part of the box model dump.
Whenever we end up with a scrollable overflow rect that goes beyond
either of its axes (i.e. the rect has a negative X or Y position
relative to its parent's absolute padding box position), we need to clip
that rect to prevent going into the "unreachable scrollable overflow".
This fixes the horizontal scrolling on https://ladybird.org (gets more
pronounced if you make the window very narrow).
Browsers such as Chrome and Firefox apply an arbitrary scale to the
current font size if `normal` is used for `line-height`. Firefox uses
1.2 while Chrome uses 1.15. Let's go with the latter for now, it's
relatively easy to change if we ever want to go back on that decision.
This also requires updating the expectations for a lot of layout tests.
The upside of this is that it's a bit easier to compare our layout
results to other browsers', especially Chrome.
Previously the input element was displayed with value 0, when no value
was set in the HTML. Now it uses `value_sanitization_algorithm()`, which
will calculate the default value.
In `value_sanitization_algorithm()` there was a logical mistake/typo.
The comment from the spec says "unless the maximum is less than the
minimum".
The added layout test would fail without the code changes.
Fixes#520
