Instead of defining somewhat high level mouse actions, allow granular
control of mouse clicks and mouse down/up/move events. We will want to
simulate things like holding down a mouse button after double clicking
and then dragging the mouse to another position in the future, and this
enables that.
While editing, we need to consider whether removing a <br> has any
effect on layout to determine whether its extraneous. This new condition
finds most cases for extraneous <br>s inside block elements.
If a node with `contenteditable=true/plaintextonly` is the child of an
editable node or an editing host, we should make it editable instead of
an editing host. This effectively merges nested editing hosts together,
which is how other browsers deal with this as well.
Gains us 5 WPT subtest passes in `editing`.
We currently delete a single code unit. If the user presses backspace on
a multi code point emoji, they are going to expect the entire emoji to
be removed. This now matches the behavior of Chrome and Firefox.
Both sides of the Editing internals now have to deal with some awkward
converting between UTF-8 and UTF-16, but the upside is that it
immediately exposed an issue with the `insertText` command: instead of
dealing with code units, it was iterating over code points causing the
selection to be updated only once instead of twice. This resulted in the
final selection potentially ending up in between a surrogate pair.
Fixes#5547 (pasting/typing surrogate pairs).
Major browsers seem to preserve `white-space: pre/pre-wrap` styles in a
`<div>` when deleting the current selection through an editing command.
The idiomatic way to support this is to have a command with a "relevant
CSS property" to make sure the value is recorded and restored where
appropriate, however, no such command exists.
Create a custom command (internal to Ladybird) that implements this
behavior.
The editing command that relies the most on this, `insertLinebreak`,
did not perform a layout update after inserting a `<br>` which caused
this algorithm to always return false. But instead of actually building
the layout tree needlessly, we can check the DOM tree instead.
The spec calls for a couple of very specific whitespace padding
techniques whenever we canonicalize whitespace during the execution of
editing commands, but it seems that other browsers have a simpler
strategy - let's adopt theirs!
We do not fire `beforeinput` events since other browsers do not seem to
do so either.
The spec asks us to check whether a command's action modified the DOM
tree. This means adding or removing nodes and attributes, or changing
character data anywhere in the tree. We have
`Document::dom_tree_version()` for node updates, but for character data
a new version number is introduced that allows us to easily keep track
of any text changes in the entire tree.
Both Chrome and Firefox return `true` whenever the value string provided
is an invalid color or the current color. Spec issue raised:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/476
Anchor the minimum functionality for this. WPT has an extensive suite
to test editing functionalities, but they all take a long time to
execute - so let's have a simple regression test in-tree for now.
