eliott/openwork
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/different-ai/openwork synced 2026-04-25 17:15:34 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Revert "docs: add cloud ROI calculator for model-cost planning (#1448)"

Browse Source 
This reverts commit 52f1c3dfc8.
This commit is contained in:
Jan Carbonell
2026-04-15 00:39:47 -07:00
parent df8d0b5530
commit 0642d2a547
2 changed files with 0 additions and 51 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

50
packages/docs/cloud-roi-calculator.mdx
View File

@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
---
title: "ROI Calculator"
description: "Estimate enterprise model cost savings when routing steady-state work to lower-cost models in OpenWork."
---
This page helps you assess the value of using OpenWork as part of a larger enterprise deployment, by comparing premium-model spend against a lower-cost OSS alternative at the same token volume.
Most large enterprises we speak are thinking in the following model: keep premium models for the highest-stakes work, and use OpenWork to route repeatable, background, or high-volume tasks to cheaper models where the quality bar still holds.
## Assumptions
- Token mix: `70%` input and `30%` output. Blended cost is a weighted average.
- Low estimate token volume: the amount bought with `$100 / month` on Opus 4.6 = `9.09M` tokens.
- High estimate token volume: the amount bought with `$1,000 / month` on Opus 4.6 = `90.91M` tokens.
- Opus 4.6 pricing: input `$5.00 / 1M tokens`, output `$25.00 / 1M tokens`.
- Kimi K2.5 pricing: input `$0.60 / 1M tokens`, output `$2.75 / 1M tokens`.
- Org size assumption: `2,500` employees.
## Blended cost per 1M tokens
- Opus 4.6: `(0.7 x $5.00) + (0.3 x $25.00) = $11.00`
- Kimi K2.5: `(0.7 x $0.60) + (0.3 x $2.75) = $1.245`
At the same token volume, Kimi K2.5 is about `8.83x` cheaper than Opus 4.6.
## Cost comparison
The yearly numbers below use the assumptions above and round to two decimals where needed.
| Model | Lower cost estimate | Higher cost estimate | Lower estimate yearly price | Higher estimate yearly price |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Opus 4.6 | `$100.00 / (month * employee)` | `$1,000.00 / (month * employee)` | `$3.00M` | `$30.00M` |
| Kimi K2.5 | `$11.32 / (month * employee)` | `$113.18 / (month * employee)` | `$0.34M` | `$3.40M` |
| Savings with Kimi K2.5 | `$88.68 / (month * employee)` | `$886.82 / (month * employee)` | `$2.66M` | `$26.60M` |
## Formulas
- Blended model cost: `(input share x input price) + (output share x output price)`
- Monthly cost per employee: `token volume in millions x blended cost per 1M tokens`
- Yearly price: `2,500 employees x 12 months x monthly cost`
## What this means for an enterprise rollout
If your team is already budgeting for Opus-level usage, moving steady-state workloads to a lower-cost model keeps the same token volume while reducing model spend by roughly `88.7%`.
That creates room to:
- keep premium models available for the hardest or most sensitive tasks,
- scale OpenWork usage to more teams without a linear model-cost increase,
- and justify broader deployment by tying platform adoption to measurable infrastructure savings.

1
packages/docs/docs.json
View File

@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@
"cloud-shared-workspaces",
"cloud-llm-providers",
"cloud-custom-llm-providers",
"cloud-roi-calculator",
"cloud-members-and-rbac"
]
},