## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies. > - V1 needs to stay local-first while also supporting shared, authenticated deployments. > - Human operators need real identities, company membership, invite flows, profile surfaces, and company-scoped access controls. > - Agents and operators also need the existing issue, inbox, workspace, approval, and plugin flows to keep working under those authenticated boundaries. > - This branch accumulated the multi-user implementation, follow-up QA fixes, workspace/runtime refinements, invite UX improvements, release-branch conflict resolution, and review hardening. > - This pull request consolidates that branch onto the current `master` branch as a single reviewable PR. > - The benefit is a complete multi-user implementation path with tests and docs carried forward without dropping existing branch work. ## What Changed - Added authenticated human-user access surfaces: auth/session routes, company user directory, profile settings, company access/member management, join requests, and invite management. - Added invite creation, invite landing, onboarding, logo/branding, invite grants, deduped join requests, and authenticated multi-user E2E coverage. - Tightened company-scoped and instance-admin authorization across board, plugin, adapter, access, issue, and workspace routes. - Added profile-image URL validation hardening, avatar preservation on name-only profile updates, and join-request uniqueness migration cleanup for pending human requests. - Added an atomic member role/status/grants update path so Company Access saves no longer leave partially updated permissions. - Improved issue chat, inbox, assignee identity rendering, sidebar/account/company navigation, workspace routing, and execution workspace reuse behavior for multi-user operation. - Added and updated server/UI tests covering auth, invites, membership, issue workspace inheritance, plugin authz, inbox/chat behavior, and multi-user flows. - Merged current `public-gh/master` into this branch, resolved all conflicts, and verified no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is included in this PR diff. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx` - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-routes-authz.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts server/src/__tests__/access-validators.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/authz-company-access.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/sidebar-preferences-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/approval-routes-idempotency.test.ts server/src/__tests__/openclaw-invite-prompt-route.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-e2e.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/auth-routes.test.ts ui/src/pages/CompanyAccess.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm db:generate` - `npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts --list` - Confirmed branch has no uncommitted changes and is `0` commits behind `public-gh/master` before PR creation. - Confirmed no `pnpm-lock.yaml` change is staged or present in the PR diff. ## Risks - High review surface area: this PR contains the accumulated multi-user branch plus follow-up fixes, so reviewers should focus especially on company-boundary enforcement and authenticated-vs-local deployment behavior. - UI behavior changed across invites, inbox, issue chat, access settings, and sidebar navigation; no browser screenshots are included in this branch-consolidation PR. - Plugin install, upgrade, and lifecycle/config mutations now require instance-admin access, which is intentional but may change expectations for non-admin board users. - A join-request dedupe migration rejects duplicate pending human requests before creating unique indexes; deployments with unusual historical duplicates should review the migration behavior. - Company member role/status/grant saves now use a new combined endpoint; older separate endpoints remain for compatibility. - Full production build was not run locally in this heartbeat; CI should cover the full matrix. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5-based model, CLI/tool-use environment. Exact deployed model identifier and context window were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Note on screenshots: this is a branch-consolidation PR for an already-developed multi-user branch, and no browser screenshots were captured during this heartbeat. --------- Co-authored-by: dotta <dotta@example.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.0 KiB
Publishing to npm
Low-level reference for how Paperclip packages are prepared and published to npm.
For the maintainer workflow, use doc/RELEASING.md. This document focuses on packaging internals.
Current Release Entry Points
Use these scripts:
scripts/release.shfor canary and stable publish flowsscripts/create-github-release.shafter pushing a stable tagscripts/rollback-latest.shto repointlatestscripts/build-npm.shfor the CLI packaging build
Paperclip no longer uses release branches or Changesets for publishing.
Why the CLI needs special packaging
The CLI package, paperclipai, imports code from workspace packages such as:
@paperclipai/server@paperclipai/db@paperclipai/shared- adapter packages under
packages/adapters/
Those workspace references are valid in development but not in a publishable npm package. The release flow rewrites versions temporarily, then builds a publishable CLI bundle.
build-npm.sh
Run:
./scripts/build-npm.sh
This script:
- runs the forbidden token check unless
--skip-checksis supplied - runs
pnpm -r typecheck - bundles the CLI entrypoint with esbuild into
cli/dist/index.js - verifies the bundled entrypoint with
node --check - rewrites
cli/package.jsoninto a publishable npm manifest and stores the dev copy ascli/package.dev.json - copies the repo
README.mdintocli/README.mdfor npm metadata
After the release script exits, the dev manifest and temporary files are restored automatically.
Package discovery and versioning
Public packages are discovered from:
packages/server/ui/cli/
The version rewrite step now uses scripts/release-package-map.mjs, which:
- finds all public packages
- sorts them topologically by internal dependencies
- rewrites each package version to the target release version
- rewrites internal
workspace:*dependency references to the exact target version - updates the CLI's displayed version string
Those rewrites are temporary. The working tree is restored after publish or dry-run.
@paperclipai/ui packaging
The UI package publishes prebuilt static assets, not the source workspace.
The ui package uses scripts/generate-ui-package-json.mjs during prepack to swap in a lean publish manifest that:
- keeps the release-managed
nameandversion - publishes only
dist/ - omits the source-only dependency graph from downstream installs
After packing or publishing, postpack restores the development manifest automatically.
Manual first publish for @paperclipai/ui
If you need to publish only the UI package once by hand, use the real package name:
@paperclipai/ui
Recommended flow from the repo root:
# optional sanity check: this 404s until the first publish exists
npm view @paperclipai/ui version
# make sure the dist payload is fresh
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build
# confirm your local npm auth before the real publish
npm whoami
# safe preview of the exact publish payload
cd ui
pnpm publish --dry-run --no-git-checks --access public
# real publish
pnpm publish --no-git-checks --access public
Notes:
- Publish from
ui/, not the repo root. prepackautomatically rewritesui/package.jsonto the lean publish manifest, andpostpackrestores the dev manifest after the command finishes.- If
npm view @paperclipai/ui versionalready returns the same version that is inui/package.json, do not republish. Bump the version or use the normal repo-wide release flow inscripts/release.sh.
If the first real publish returns npm E404, check npm-side prerequisites before retrying:
npm whoamimust succeed first. An expired or missing npm login will block the publish.- For an organization-scoped package like
@paperclipai/ui, thepaperclipainpm organization must exist and the publisher must be a member with permission to publish to that scope. - The initial publish must include
--access publicfor a public scoped package. - npm also requires either account 2FA for publishing or a granular token that is allowed to bypass 2FA.
Version formats
Paperclip uses calendar versions:
- stable:
YYYY.MDD.P - canary:
YYYY.MDD.P-canary.N
Examples:
- stable:
2026.318.0 - canary:
2026.318.1-canary.2
Publish model
Canary
Canaries publish under the npm dist-tag canary.
Example:
paperclipai@2026.318.1-canary.2
This keeps the default install path unchanged while allowing explicit installs with:
npx paperclipai@canary onboard
Stable
Stable publishes use the npm dist-tag latest.
Example:
paperclipai@2026.318.0
Stable publishes do not create a release commit. Instead:
- package versions are rewritten temporarily
- packages are published from the chosen source commit
- git tag
vYYYY.MDD.Ppoints at that original commit
Trusted publishing
The intended CI model is npm trusted publishing through GitHub OIDC.
That means:
- no long-lived
NPM_TOKENin repository secrets - GitHub Actions obtains short-lived publish credentials
- trusted publisher rules are configured per workflow file
See doc/RELEASE-AUTOMATION-SETUP.md for the GitHub/npm setup steps.
Rollback model
Rollback does not unpublish anything.
It repoints the latest dist-tag to a prior stable version:
./scripts/rollback-latest.sh 2026.318.0
This is the fastest way to restore the default install path if a stable release is bad.