[picture-aspect-ratio.html]
  [Computed style]
    expected: FAIL

  [Computed style for width/height/aspect-ratio]
    expected: FAIL

  [Source width/height should take precedence over img attributes.]
    expected: FAIL

  [Make sure style gets invalidated correctly when the source gets removed.]
    expected: FAIL

  [If the <source> has only one of width/height, we don't get an aspect ratio, even if the <img> has both.]
    expected: FAIL

  [If we don't have width/height on the source, we fall back to width/height on the <img>.]
    expected: FAIL

  [If we only have one width/height attribute, we should get that attribute mapped but no aspect ratio, even if <img> has attributes.]
    expected: FAIL

  [Dynamically changing width/height should change computed style]
    expected: FAIL

  [Changing which <source> matches should change computed style]
    expected: FAIL

  [Percentages on source should be ignored for aspect-ratio but used for width/height.]
    expected: FAIL

  [Trailing garbage should be ignored but not make the attribute invalid]
    expected: FAIL

  [If we only have one width attribute, we should get width mapped but no aspect ratio, even if <img> has attributes.]
    expected: FAIL

  [If we only have height attribute, we should get height mapped but no aspect ratio, even if <img> has attributes.]
    expected: FAIL

  [Loaded picture test: <source> with width and height attributes, <img> without width and height attributes]
    expected: FAIL

  [Loaded picture test: Both <source> and <img> are with width and height attributes]
    expected: FAIL