fix(#2660): capture prose after labeled bold in extractOneLinerFromBody (#2679)

* fix(#2660): capture prose after label in extractOneLinerFromBody

The regex `\*\*([^*]+)\*\*` matched the first bold span, so for the new
SUMMARY template `**One-liner:** Real prose here.` it captured the label
`One-liner:` instead of the prose. MILESTONES.md then wrote bullets like
`- One-liner:` with no content.

Handle both template forms:
- Labeled:  `**One-liner:** prose`  → prose
- Bare:     `**prose**`             → prose (legacy)

Empty prose after a label returns null so no bogus bullets are emitted.

Note: existing MILESTONES.md entries generated under the bug are not
regenerated here — that is a follow-up.

Closes #2660

* fix(#2660): normalize CRLF before one-liner extraction

Windows-authored SUMMARY files use CRLF line endings; the LF-only regex
in extractOneLinerFromBody would fail to match. Normalize \r\n and \r
to \n before stripping frontmatter and matching the one-liner pattern.

Adds test case (h) covering CRLF input.

get-shit-done/bin/lib/core.cjs

@@ -1756,11 +1756,28 @@ function resolveReasoningEffortInternal(cwd, agentType) {
  */
 function extractOneLinerFromBody(content) {
   if (!content) return null;
+  // Normalize EOLs so matching works for LF and CRLF files.
+  const normalized = content.replace(/\r\n/g, '\n').replace(/\r/g, '\n');
   // Strip frontmatter first
-  const body = content.replace(/^---\n[\s\S]*?\n---\n*/, '');
-  // Find the first **...** line after a # heading
-  const match = body.match(/^#[^\n]*\n+\*\*([^*]+)\*\*/m);
-  return match ? match[1].trim() : null;
+  const body = normalized.replace(/^---\n[\s\S]*?\n---\n*/, '');
+  // Find the first **...** span on a line after a # heading.
+  // Two supported template forms:
+  //   1) Labeled:  **One-liner:** Real prose here.   (bug #2660 — new template)
+  //   2) Bare:     **Real prose here.**              (legacy template)
+  // For (1), the first bold span ends in a colon and the prose that follows
+  // on the same line is the one-liner. For (2), the bold span itself is the
+  // one-liner.
+  const match = body.match(/^#[^\n]*\n+\*\*([^*\n]+)\*\*([^\n]*)/m);
+  if (!match) return null;
+  const boldInner = match[1].trim();
+  const afterBold = match[2];
+  // Labeled form: bold span is a "Label:" prefix — capture prose after it.
+  if (/:\s*$/.test(boldInner)) {
+    const prose = afterBold.trim();
+    return prose.length > 0 ? prose : null;
+  }
+  // Bare form: the bold content itself is the one-liner.
+  return boldInner.length > 0 ? boldInner : null;
 }
 
 // ─── Misc utilities ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

tests/bug-2660-one-liner-extraction.test.cjs

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+/**
+ * Bug #2660: `gsd-tools milestone complete <version>` writes MILESTONES.md
+ * bullets that read "- One-liner:" (the literal label) instead of the prose
+ * after the label.
+ *
+ * Root cause: extractOneLinerFromBody() matches the first **...** span. In
+ * `**One-liner:** prose`, the first span contains only `One-liner:` so the
+ * function returns the label instead of the prose after it.
+ */
+
+const { describe, test } = require('node:test');
+const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
+const path = require('path');
+
+const { extractOneLinerFromBody } = require(
+  path.join(__dirname, '..', 'get-shit-done', 'bin', 'lib', 'core.cjs')
+);
+
+describe('bug #2660: extractOneLinerFromBody', () => {
+  test('a) body-style **One-liner:** label returns prose after the label', () => {
+    const content =
+      '# Phase 2 Plan 01: Foundation Summary\n\n**One-liner:** Real prose here.\n';
+    assert.strictEqual(extractOneLinerFromBody(content), 'Real prose here.');
+  });
+
+  test('b) frontmatter-only one-liner returns null (caller handles frontmatter)', () => {
+    const content =
+      '---\none-liner: Set up project\n---\n\n# Phase 1: Foundation Summary\n\nBody prose with no bold line.\n';
+    assert.strictEqual(extractOneLinerFromBody(content), null);
+  });
+
+  test('c) no one-liner at all returns null', () => {
+    const content =
+      '# Phase 1: Foundation Summary\n\nJust some narrative, no bold line.\n';
+    assert.strictEqual(extractOneLinerFromBody(content), null);
+  });
+
+  test('d) bold spans inside the prose are preserved', () => {
+    const content =
+      '# Phase 1: Foundation Summary\n\n**One-liner:** This is **important** stuff.\n';
+    assert.strictEqual(
+      extractOneLinerFromBody(content),
+      'This is **important** stuff.'
+    );
+  });
+
+  test('e) empty prose after label returns null (no bogus bullet)', () => {
+    const empty =
+      '# Phase 1: Foundation Summary\n\n**One-liner:**\n\nRest of body.\n';
+    const whitespace =
+      '# Phase 1: Foundation Summary\n\n**One-liner:**   \n\nRest of body.\n';
+    assert.strictEqual(extractOneLinerFromBody(empty), null);
+    assert.strictEqual(extractOneLinerFromBody(whitespace), null);
+  });
+
+  test('f) legacy bare **prose** format still works (no label, no colon)', () => {
+    // Preserve pre-existing behavior: SUMMARY files historically used
+    // `**bold prose**` with no label. See tests/commands.test.cjs:366 and
+    // tests/milestone.test.cjs:451 — both assert this form.
+    const content =
+      '---\nphase: "01"\n---\n\n# Phase 1: Foundation Summary\n\n**JWT auth with refresh rotation using jose library**\n\n## Performance\n';
+    assert.strictEqual(
+      extractOneLinerFromBody(content),
+      'JWT auth with refresh rotation using jose library'
+    );
+  });
+
+  test('g) other **Label:** prefixes (e.g. Summary:) also capture prose after label', () => {
+    const content =
+      '# Phase 1: Foundation Summary\n\n**Summary:** Built the thing.\n';
+    assert.strictEqual(extractOneLinerFromBody(content), 'Built the thing.');
+  });
+
+  test('h) CRLF line endings (Windows) are handled', () => {
+    const content =
+      '---\r\nphase: "01"\r\n---\r\n\r\n# Phase 1: Foundation Summary\r\n\r\n**One-liner:** Windows-authored prose.\r\n';
+    assert.strictEqual(
+      extractOneLinerFromBody(content),
+      'Windows-authored prose.'
+    );
+  });
+});