mirror of
https://github.com/glittercowboy/get-shit-done
synced 2026-04-25 17:25:23 +02:00
* refactor(workflows): extract discuss-phase modes/templates/advisor for progressive disclosure (closes #2551) Splits 1,347-line workflows/discuss-phase.md into a 495-line dispatcher plus per-mode files in workflows/discuss-phase/modes/ and templates in workflows/discuss-phase/templates/. Mirrors the progressive-disclosure pattern that #2361 enforced for agents. - Per-mode files: power, all, auto, chain, text, batch, analyze, default, advisor - Templates lazy-loaded at the step that produces the artifact (CONTEXT.md template at write_context, DISCUSSION-LOG.md template at git_commit, checkpoint.json schema when checkpointing) - Advisor mode gated behind `[ -f $HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/USER-PROFILE.md ]` — inverse of #2174's --advisor flag (don't pay the cost when unused) - scout_codebase phase-type→map selection table extracted to references/scout-codebase.md - New tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs enforces tiered budgets across all workflows/*.md (XL=1700 / LARGE=1500 / DEFAULT=1000) plus the explicit <500 ceiling for discuss-phase.md per #2551 - Existing tests updated to read from the new file locations after the split (functional equivalence preserved — content moved, not removed) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2607): align modes/auto.md check_existing with parent (Update it, not Skip) CodeRabbit flagged drift between the parent step (which auto-selects "Update it") and modes/auto.md (which documented "Skip"). The pre-refactor file had both — line 182 said "Skip" in the overview, line 250 said "Update it" in the actual step. The step is authoritative. Fix the new mode file to match. Refs: PR #2607 review comment 3127783430 * test(#2607): harden discuss-phase regression tests after #2551 split CodeRabbit identified four test smells where the split weakened coverage: - workflow-size-budget: assertion was unreachable (entered if-block on match, then asserted occurrences === 0 — always failed). Now unconditional. - bug-2549-2550-2552: bounded-read assertion checked concatenated source, so src.includes('3') was satisfied by unrelated content in scout-codebase.md (e.g., "3-5 most relevant files"). Now reads parent only with a stricter regex. Also asserts SCOUT_REF exists. - chain-flag-plan-phase: filter(existsSync) silently skipped a missing modes/chain.md. Now fails loudly via explicit asserts. - discuss-checkpoint: same silent-filter pattern across three sources. Now asserts each required path before reading. Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783457, 3127783452, plus nitpicks for chain-flag-plan-phase.test.cjs:21-24 and discuss-checkpoint.test.cjs:22-27 * docs(#2607): fix INVENTORY count, context.md placeholders, scout grep portability - INVENTORY.md: subdirectory note said "50 top-level references" but the section header now says 51. Updated to 51. - templates/context.md: footer hardcoded XX-name instead of declared placeholders [X]/[Name], which would leak sample text into generated CONTEXT.md files. Now uses the declared placeholders. - references/scout-codebase.md: no-maps fallback used grep -rl with "\\|" alternation (GNU grep only — silent on BSD/macOS grep). Switched to grep -rlE with extended regex for portability. Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783404, 3127783448, plus nitpick for scout-codebase.md:32-40 * docs(#2607): label fenced examples + clarify overlay/advisor precedence - analyze.md / text.md / default.md: add language tags (markdown/text) to fenced example blocks to silence markdownlint MD040 warnings flagged by CodeRabbit (one fence in analyze.md, two in text.md, five in default.md). - discuss-phase.md: document overlay stacking rules in discuss_areas — fixed outer→inner order --analyze → --batch → --text, with a pointer to each overlay file for mode-specific precedence. - advisor.md: add tie-breaker rules for NON_TECHNICAL_OWNER signals — explicit technical_background overrides inferred signals; otherwise OR-aggregate; contradictory explanation_depth values resolve by most-recent-wins. Refs: PR #2607 review comments 3127783415, 3127783437, plus nitpicks for default.md:24, discuss-phase.md:345-365, and advisor.md:51-56 * fix(#2607): extract codebase_drift_gate body to keep execute-phase under XL budget PR #2605 added 80 lines to execute-phase.md (1622 -> 1702), pushing it over the XL_BUDGET=1700 line cap enforced by tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs (introduced by this PR). Per the test's own remediation hint and #2551's progressive-disclosure pattern, extract the codebase_drift_gate step body to get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase/steps/codebase-drift-gate.md and leave a brief pointer in the workflow. execute-phase.md is now 1633 lines. Budget is NOT relaxed; the offending workflow is tightened. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
89 lines
3.8 KiB
JavaScript
89 lines
3.8 KiB
JavaScript
/**
|
|
* GSD Tools Tests - discuss-phase incremental checkpoint saves
|
|
*
|
|
* Validates that the discuss-phase workflow includes incremental
|
|
* checkpoint logic to prevent answer loss on session interruption.
|
|
*
|
|
* Closes: #1485
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
|
|
describe('discuss-phase incremental checkpoint saves (#1485)', () => {
|
|
const workflowPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'get-shit-done', 'workflows', 'discuss-phase.md');
|
|
// After #2551 progressive-disclosure refactor, checkpoint logic lives in the
|
|
// default mode file and the JSON schema lives in the templates directory.
|
|
const defaultModePath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'get-shit-done', 'workflows', 'discuss-phase', 'modes', 'default.md');
|
|
const checkpointTplPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'get-shit-done', 'workflows', 'discuss-phase', 'templates', 'checkpoint.json');
|
|
|
|
function readAll() {
|
|
// Fail loudly if any required source is missing — silent filtering would
|
|
// let a regression that deletes the extracted default-mode or checkpoint
|
|
// template pass the suite.
|
|
for (const p of [workflowPath, defaultModePath, checkpointTplPath]) {
|
|
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(p), `Required discuss-phase checkpoint source missing: ${p}`);
|
|
}
|
|
return [workflowPath, defaultModePath, checkpointTplPath]
|
|
.map(p => fs.readFileSync(p, 'utf8'))
|
|
.join('\n');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test('workflow writes checkpoint file after each area completes', () => {
|
|
const content = readAll();
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('DISCUSS-CHECKPOINT.json'),
|
|
'workflow should reference checkpoint JSON file'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Incremental checkpoint') || content.includes('incremental checkpoint'),
|
|
'workflow should describe incremental checkpoint saves'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('checkpoint includes decisions, areas completed, and areas remaining', () => {
|
|
const content = readAll();
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('areas_completed'), 'checkpoint should track completed areas');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('areas_remaining'), 'checkpoint should track remaining areas');
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes('"decisions"'), 'checkpoint should include decisions object');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('check_existing step detects checkpoint for session resume', () => {
|
|
const content = readAll();
|
|
// The check_existing step should look for checkpoint files
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('DISCUSS-CHECKPOINT.json') && content.includes('Resume'),
|
|
'check_existing should detect checkpoint and offer resume'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('checkpoint is cleaned up after successful CONTEXT.md write', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('rm -f') && content.includes('DISCUSS-CHECKPOINT'),
|
|
'checkpoint file should be deleted after successful write_context'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('success criteria include checkpoint requirements', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
const criteriaMatch = content.match(/<success_criteria>([\s\S]*?)<\/success_criteria>/);
|
|
const criteria = criteriaMatch ? criteriaMatch[1] : '';
|
|
assert.ok(criteria.includes('checkpoint') || criteria.includes('Checkpoint'),
|
|
'success criteria should mention checkpoints');
|
|
assert.ok(criteria.includes('resume') || criteria.includes('Resume'),
|
|
'success criteria should mention session resume capability');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('auto mode also writes checkpoints', () => {
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(workflowPath, 'utf8');
|
|
// The checkpoint section should mention auto mode
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('auto-resolves') || content.includes('--auto'),
|
|
'checkpoint logic should apply to both interactive and auto modes'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|