Previously, has_scrollable_overflow was a purely geometric check, true
whenever content extended beyond the padding box regardless of the
overflow property. This caused unnecessary scroll frame allocation for
boxes with `overflow:visible`.
Per CSS Overflow 3, scrollable overflow is only defined for scroll
containers (overflow: auto/hidden/scroll). Gate the flag on
`is_scroll_container()` so that only actual scroll containers get scroll
frames assigned.
Previously, buttons with `display: block` and `width: auto` would take
an early return path in compute_width() that set the content width to
fit-content but skipped all margin resolution. This meant `margin: auto`
would not center the button horizontally.
Per CSS 2.1 Section 10.5, percentage heights should only resolve when
the containing block's height is "specified explicitly". This means a
containing block with `height: auto` and `min-height: 50px` does NOT
provide a definite height for percentage resolution - the child's
`height: 100%` should be treated as `auto`.
Previously, we checked `available_space.height.is_indefinite()` to
determine if percentage heights should become auto. However, this
conflated "available layout space" with "containing block height for
percentage resolution" - these are distinct concepts.
Now we check the containing block's `has_definite_height()` flag, which
correctly reflects whether the containing block has an explicit height
property. This handles:
- Anonymous wrapper blocks (skip them to find real containing block)
- Quirks mode (has special percentage height handling)
- Absolutely positioned elements (excluded, different rules apply)
Also update `calculate_inner_height()` to use the containing block's
actual used height when resolving percentages with indefinite available
space, which fixes inline-block and similar cases.
Compute inline-block baselines by traversing into nested block children
to find the last in-flow line box, using correct offsets relative to the
margin box edge.
Also ensure inline-flex and inline-grid containers always derive their
baseline from content (per CSS Align), and add special handling for
<input> elements which have `overflow: clip` in the UA stylesheet but
should still align adjacent text with their internal content.
When computing the width of a box with `width: auto` in an intrinsic
sizing context (min-content or max-content), we previously called
calculate_min/max_content_width() for every such box.
This was wasteful for boxes that don't establish their own formatting
context (e.g. plain divs in a BFC), since their intrinsic width is
simply the intrinsic width of their contents, which we're already
computing as part of the current layout pass.
By only computing intrinsic widths separately for boxes that actually
create a new formatting context (BFC, flex, grid, table, etc.), we
avoid creating redundant throwaway LayoutState objects and formatting
contexts.
For deeply nested structures with `width: max-content` on an ancestor,
this reduces the number of formatting contexts created from O(n) to
O(1), where n is the nesting depth.
An BlockContainer inside an InlineNode is called from the
`for each in inclusive_subtree_of_type` but is also a fragment
of that InlineNode. Don't count the the Node twice.
Peek is used to determine if the current chunk is
the last and if so, add trailing box metrics.
For this to work correctly, it must be done only
after calling next(), otherwise peek gives us the
current chunk.
Whether an absbox is positioned below or to the right of its previous
sibling in an `InlineFormattingContext` is determined by the
display-outside value before blockification, so we store the
pre-blockification `display` value in `ComputedValues` to access it in
`InlineFormattingContext` and position the box accordingly.
Previously, we were collapsing whitespace in Layout::TextNode and then
passed the resulting string for further processing through ChunkIterator
-> InlineLevelIterator -> InlineFormattingContext -> LineBuilder ->
LineBoxFragment -> PaintableFragment. Our painting tree is where we deal
with things like range offsets into the underlying text nodes, but since
we modified the original string, the offsets were wrong.
This changes the way we generate fragments:
* Layout::TextNode no longer collapses whitespace as part of its
stored "text for rendering", but moves this logic to ChunkIterator
which splits up this text into separate views whenever whitespace
needs to be collapsed.
* Layout::LineBox now only extends the last fragment if its end offset
is equal to the new fragment's start offset. Otherwise, there's a
gap caused by collapsing whitespace and we need to generate a
separate fragment for that in order to have a correct start offset.
Some tests need new baselines because of the fixed start offsets.
Fixes#566.
This change removes premature reset of
`block_container_y_position_update_callback`. Also makes callback
private in `BlockMarginState`, because resetting it independently of
currently accumulated margins is incorrect.
Lots of test expectations are updated, but there is no visual
difference.
Fixes https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/issues/6074
If we were calculating the static position for an absolutely positioned
inline box that resides in the last line of its containing block, we
would not have yet provided the fragments in that line with their
final positions. Additionally, we would always move the box beneath the
fragment, which was incorrect.
Fixes#5867.
Inline nodes in our layout tree have a position, so let's show it. By
centralizing the logic for this, block nodes now lose their redundant
'content-size' dump info which is already part of the box model dump.
All fragments inside an atomic inline box should stay within that box,
otherwise we'll screw up the paint order and paint them behind things
that they're supposed to be on top of.
This fixes an issue with inline-block content not appearing on sites
like Google Docs and Reddit, among others.
There are some nuances to creating these wrappers, such as manually
propagating certain text styles that are not inherited by default. We
already have the logic for this in
`NodeWithStyle::create_anonymous_wrapper()`, so reuse that method in our
implementation of the button layout.
Fixes applying certain text styles (such as `text-decoration`) to the
text of a `<button>`.
In 89ba00304c, the box' X position was
capped at 0 to prevent negative X positions to act as if there were
intruding floats on the left side. Instead, we need to check whether the
left side float intrusion we are going to calculate matters at all -
because if there's no matching float box, the intrusion is always going
to be 0 and we don't need to take the box' X position into account.
Fixes the floating publication images on https://lexfridman.com/.
This behavior is part of the cyclic percentage contribution logic from
CSS-SIZING-3 which explicitly only applies to non-replaced boxes.
This fixes an issue on Discord where buttons in the settings UI were
cropped to a narrower width than intended.
Fixes#3572
While 788d5368a7 took care of better text
marker positioning, this improves graphical marker positioning instead.
By looking at how Firefox and Chrome render markers, it's clear that
there are three parts to positioning a graphical marker:
* The containing space that the marker resides in;
* The marker dimensions;
* The distance between the marker and the start of the list item.
The space that the marker can be contained in, is the area to the left
of the list item with a height of the marker's line-height. The marker
dimensions are relative to the marker's font's pixel size: most of them
are a square at 35% of the font size, but the disclosure markers are
sized at 50% instead. Finally, the marker distance is always gauged at
50% of the font size.
So for example, a list item with `list-style-type: disc` and `font-size:
20px`, has 10px between its start and the right side of the marker, and
the marker's dimensions are 7x7.
The percentages I've chosen closely resemble how Firefox lays out its
list item markers.
This commit is a three-parter that is hard to separate without breaking
marker rendering:
1. Any marker style that results in a string, except for a literal
string (e.g. `list-style-type: "@"`), should get the string ". "
appended. We forgot to do this for the alpha and roman types.
2. Instead of using the "pixel size rounded up" from a font and adding
an arbitrary 1 to that, we now use the exact pixel size for as long
as possible to improve our vertical positioning of markers.
3. Instead of always adding a "default marker width" to the marker
content width, we now only do this if we did not have text metrics
available (i.e. the marker style is not a text type). This greatly
improves horizontal positioning of text markers.
Before this change, we were always behaving as if box-sizing were
content-box for block-level replaced element widths.
This fixes the squishy logo on https://videolan.org/
Whenever we end up with a scrollable overflow rect that goes beyond
either of its axes (i.e. the rect has a negative X or Y position
relative to its parent's absolute padding box position), we need to clip
that rect to prevent going into the "unreachable scrollable overflow".
This fixes the horizontal scrolling on https://ladybird.org (gets more
pronounced if you make the window very narrow).
...with inline children. This fixes an issue when we ignore abspos boxes
contained by PaintableWithLines while calculating overflow rect size.
Lots of layout tests are affected, because now PaintableWithLines has
overflow rect.
`Text/input/DOM/Element-set-scroll-left.html` is also affected and now
matches other browsers.
We were only dumping a PaintableBox' dimensions if its layout node was a
Layout::Box as well, causing us to not dump the dimensions of paintables
for inline nodes in the paintable tree.
In `InlineLevelIterator`, whenever we call `skip_to_next()` and enter a
node with box model metrics, we could potentially accumulate leading and
trailing metrics. This lead to a weird situation where an element with
`display: inline-block` could adopt the leading metrics of an inline
element that follows it, since we perform the call to
`add_extra_box_model_metrics_to_item()` too late.
Move `skip_to_next()` down so it no longer interferes with the `Item`
we're creating.
The test expectation for
`atomic-inline-with-percentage-vertical-align.html` is updated, although
neither the old nor new results are 100% accurate since either box jumps
one pixel to the right.
We used to subtract the maximum right margin of any containing box,
but we want to subtract the entire right margin instead. This yielded
incorrect intrusions for right floats not placed in the root.
When restructuring a block node inside an inline parent, if the
nearest block ancestor is `display: inline-block`, ensure that
the generated anonymous wrappers also have `display: inline-block`.
This fixes layout issues with block elements nested
inside inline-block elements.
Previously floats would be placed next to the highest float that
fitted the new float on its line. However, this violates the rule
that floats should be placed under the preceding float if it does
not fit next to it.
Originally part of a fix in 15103d172c, it
appears that this is no longer necessary and received a better fix in a
more recent commit. Resolves a visual regression with the ACID3 test.
We would only correct for the left margin of the containing block of the
child box that we are laying out, but we actually need to correct for
all left margins up until the containing block that contains both the
float and the child box.
Fixes#4639.
Browsers such as Chrome and Firefox apply an arbitrary scale to the
current font size if `normal` is used for `line-height`. Firefox uses
1.2 while Chrome uses 1.15. Let's go with the latter for now, it's
relatively easy to change if we ever want to go back on that decision.
This also requires updating the expectations for a lot of layout tests.
The upside of this is that it's a bit easier to compare our layout
results to other browsers', especially Chrome.
Whenever we introduce a block element in a container that at that point
has only had inline children, we create an anonymous wrapper for all the
inline elements so we can keep the invariant that each container
contains either inline or non-inline children. For some reason, we
ignore all the out-of-flow nodes since they are layed out separately and
it was thought that this shouldn't matter.
However, if we are dealing with inline blocks and floating blocks, the
order of the inline contents _including_ out-of-flow nodes becomes very
important: floating blocks need to take the order of nodes into account
when positioning themselves.
Fix this by simply hoisting the out-of-flow nodes into the anonymous
wrapper as well.
Fixes the order of blocks in #4212. The gap is still not present.
In 15103d172c we applied any remaining vertical float clearance to the
BFC's current Y offset for the next block to layout, because a `<br
style="clear: left">` could introduce clearance that would otherwise be
ignored. However, a `<div>` that floats _and_ clears `right` also
introduces this clearance and it is obvious that this should not push
down any subsequent blocks to layout in the current BFC.
Turns out, we don't need this change anymore. Some other later change
also fixed the underlying issue, and by getting rid of the original fix
we can now render https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SerenityOS correctly
again.
Fixes#4418.
When determining the content/margin box rects within their ancestor's
coordinate space, we were returning early if the passed in values
already belonged to the requested ancestor. Unfortunately, we had
already applied the used values' offset to the rect, which is the offset
to the ancestor's ancestor.
This simplifies the logic to always apply the rect offset after checking
if we've reached the ancestor. Fixes determining float intrusions inside
block elements with `margin: auto` set.
Fixes#4083.
If a block with inline children ends with a line break clearing any
floats, we not only need to take the introduced clearance into account
for the next line box, but the containing block needs to set the correct
height as well.
Since the spec calls for using the last line box' bottom as the resolved
height (if treated as auto), we now correctly apply the clearance to the
previous line box' bottom coordinate.
Fixes#4058.
We were accidentally providing it with absolute Y-coordinates, messing
up stacked floating boxes that would otherwise intrude on each other.
Fixes#4160.
Whenever we generate line boxes, we might end up with a residual
vertical float clearance by way of having a `<br>` with `clear: ..` set.
Set the Y offset of the next block level box to place by this vertical
clearance.
Relates to #4058.
