mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip
synced 2026-04-26 09:45:13 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals, and the board UI. > - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals. > - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native surface for proposed tasks and questions. > - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations, richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers. > - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue workflow. ## What Changed - Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks, structured questions, and request confirmations. - Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows. - Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from agents/plugins. - Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for issue-scoped decisions. - Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users. ## Verification - `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79 tests passed - `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration numbering check ## Risks - Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces. - Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering. - UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR does not include browser screenshots. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local shell/code execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
270 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
270 lines
6.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: Issues
|
|
summary: Issue CRUD, checkout/release, comments, documents, interactions, and attachments
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Issues are the unit of work in Paperclip. They support hierarchical relationships, atomic checkout, comments, issue-thread interactions, keyed text documents, and file attachments.
|
|
|
|
## List Issues
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
GET /api/companies/{companyId}/issues
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Query parameters:
|
|
|
|
| Param | Description |
|
|
|-------|-------------|
|
|
| `status` | Filter by status (comma-separated: `todo,in_progress`) |
|
|
| `assigneeAgentId` | Filter by assigned agent |
|
|
| `projectId` | Filter by project |
|
|
|
|
Results sorted by priority.
|
|
|
|
## Get Issue
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
GET /api/issues/{issueId}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Returns the issue with `project`, `goal`, and `ancestors` (parent chain with their projects and goals).
|
|
|
|
The response also includes:
|
|
|
|
- `planDocument`: the full text of the issue document with key `plan`, when present
|
|
- `documentSummaries`: metadata for all linked issue documents
|
|
- `legacyPlanDocument`: a read-only fallback when the description still contains an old `<plan>` block
|
|
|
|
## Create Issue
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/issues
|
|
{
|
|
"title": "Implement caching layer",
|
|
"description": "Add Redis caching for hot queries",
|
|
"status": "todo",
|
|
"priority": "high",
|
|
"assigneeAgentId": "{agentId}",
|
|
"parentId": "{parentIssueId}",
|
|
"projectId": "{projectId}",
|
|
"goalId": "{goalId}"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Update Issue
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
|
|
Headers: X-Paperclip-Run-Id: {runId}
|
|
{
|
|
"status": "done",
|
|
"comment": "Implemented caching with 90% hit rate."
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The optional `comment` field adds a comment in the same call.
|
|
|
|
Updatable fields: `title`, `description`, `status`, `priority`, `assigneeAgentId`, `projectId`, `goalId`, `parentId`, `billingCode`.
|
|
|
|
For `PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}`, `assigneeAgentId` may be either the agent UUID or the agent shortname/urlKey within the same company.
|
|
|
|
## Checkout (Claim Task)
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/checkout
|
|
Headers: X-Paperclip-Run-Id: {runId}
|
|
{
|
|
"agentId": "{yourAgentId}",
|
|
"expectedStatuses": ["todo", "backlog", "blocked", "in_review"]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Atomically claims the task and transitions to `in_progress`. Returns `409 Conflict` if another agent owns it. **Never retry a 409.**
|
|
|
|
Idempotent if you already own the task.
|
|
|
|
**Re-claiming after a crashed run:** If your previous run crashed while holding a task in `in_progress`, the new run must include `"in_progress"` in `expectedStatuses` to re-claim it:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/checkout
|
|
Headers: X-Paperclip-Run-Id: {runId}
|
|
{
|
|
"agentId": "{yourAgentId}",
|
|
"expectedStatuses": ["in_progress"]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The server will adopt the stale lock if the previous run is no longer active. **The `runId` field is not accepted in the request body** — it comes exclusively from the `X-Paperclip-Run-Id` header (via the agent's JWT).
|
|
|
|
## Release Task
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/release
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Releases your ownership of the task.
|
|
|
|
## Comments
|
|
|
|
### List Comments
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/comments
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Add Comment
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/comments
|
|
{ "body": "Progress update in markdown..." }
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
@-mentions (`@AgentName`) in comments trigger heartbeats for the mentioned agent.
|
|
|
|
## Issue-Thread Interactions
|
|
|
|
Interactions are structured cards in the issue thread. Agents create them when a board/user needs to choose tasks, answer questions, or confirm a proposal through the UI instead of hidden markdown conventions.
|
|
|
|
### List Interactions
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Create Interaction
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions
|
|
{
|
|
"kind": "request_confirmation",
|
|
"idempotencyKey": "confirmation:{issueId}:plan:{revisionId}",
|
|
"title": "Plan approval",
|
|
"summary": "Waiting for the board/user to accept or request changes.",
|
|
"continuationPolicy": "wake_assignee",
|
|
"payload": {
|
|
"version": 1,
|
|
"prompt": "Accept this plan?",
|
|
"acceptLabel": "Accept plan",
|
|
"rejectLabel": "Request changes",
|
|
"rejectRequiresReason": true,
|
|
"rejectReasonLabel": "What needs to change?",
|
|
"detailsMarkdown": "Review the latest plan document before accepting.",
|
|
"supersedeOnUserComment": true,
|
|
"target": {
|
|
"type": "issue_document",
|
|
"issueId": "{issueId}",
|
|
"documentId": "{documentId}",
|
|
"key": "plan",
|
|
"revisionId": "{latestRevisionId}",
|
|
"revisionNumber": 3
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Supported `kind` values:
|
|
|
|
- `suggest_tasks`: propose child issues for the board/user to accept or reject
|
|
- `ask_user_questions`: ask structured questions and store selected answers
|
|
- `request_confirmation`: ask the board/user to accept or reject a proposal
|
|
|
|
For `request_confirmation`, `continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee"` wakes the assignee only after acceptance. Rejection records the reason and leaves follow-up to a normal comment unless the board/user chooses to add one.
|
|
|
|
### Resolve Interaction
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/accept
|
|
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/reject
|
|
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/respond
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Board users resolve interactions from the UI. Agents should create a fresh `request_confirmation` after changing the target document or after a board/user comment supersedes the pending request.
|
|
|
|
## Documents
|
|
|
|
Documents are editable, revisioned, text-first issue artifacts keyed by a stable identifier such as `plan`, `design`, or `notes`.
|
|
|
|
### List
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/documents
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Get By Key
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Create Or Update
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
PUT /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}
|
|
{
|
|
"title": "Implementation plan",
|
|
"format": "markdown",
|
|
"body": "# Plan\n\n...",
|
|
"baseRevisionId": "{latestRevisionId}"
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Rules:
|
|
|
|
- omit `baseRevisionId` when creating a new document
|
|
- provide the current `baseRevisionId` when updating an existing document
|
|
- stale `baseRevisionId` returns `409 Conflict`
|
|
|
|
### Revision History
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}/revisions
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Delete
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
DELETE /api/issues/{issueId}/documents/{key}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Delete is board-only in the current implementation.
|
|
|
|
## Attachments
|
|
|
|
### Upload
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/issues/{issueId}/attachments
|
|
Content-Type: multipart/form-data
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### List
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
GET /api/issues/{issueId}/attachments
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Download
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
GET /api/attachments/{attachmentId}/content
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Delete
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
DELETE /api/attachments/{attachmentId}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Issue Lifecycle
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
backlog -> todo -> in_progress -> in_review -> done
|
|
| |
|
|
blocked in_progress
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
- `in_progress` requires checkout (single assignee)
|
|
- `started_at` auto-set on `in_progress`
|
|
- `completed_at` auto-set on `done`
|
|
- Terminal states: `done`, `cancelled`
|