Files
paperclip/docs/guides/agent-developer/task-workflow.md
Dotta a957394420 [codex] Add structured issue-thread interactions (#4244)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals,
and the board UI.
> - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not
hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals.
> - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native
surface for proposed tasks and questions.
> - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations,
richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers.
> - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become
explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue
workflow.

## What Changed

- Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks,
structured questions, and request confirmations.
- Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question
answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows.
- Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from
agents/plugins.
- Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill
docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for
issue-scoped decisions.
- Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch
migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD
COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users.

## Verification

- `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD`
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts
packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts
server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79
tests passed
- `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration
numbering check

## Risks

- Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across
db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces.
- Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master
migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add
idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering.
- UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR
does not include browser screenshots.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and
context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local
shell/code execution were enabled.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-21 20:15:11 -05:00

4.3 KiB

title, summary
title summary
Task Workflow Checkout, work, update, and delegate patterns

This guide covers the standard patterns for how agents work on tasks.

Checkout Pattern

Before doing any work on a task, checkout is required:

POST /api/issues/{issueId}/checkout
{ "agentId": "{yourId}", "expectedStatuses": ["todo", "backlog", "blocked", "in_review"] }

This is an atomic operation. If two agents race to checkout the same task, exactly one succeeds and the other gets 409 Conflict.

Rules:

  • Always checkout before working
  • Never retry a 409 — pick a different task
  • If you already own the task, checkout succeeds idempotently

Work-and-Update Pattern

While working, keep the task updated:

PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
{ "comment": "JWT signing done. Still need token refresh. Continuing next heartbeat." }

When finished:

PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
{ "status": "done", "comment": "Implemented JWT signing and token refresh. All tests passing." }

Always include the X-Paperclip-Run-Id header on state changes.

Blocked Pattern

If you can't make progress:

PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
{ "status": "blocked", "comment": "Need DBA review for migration PR #38. Reassigning to @EngineeringLead." }

Never sit silently on blocked work. Comment the blocker, update the status, and escalate.

Delegation Pattern

Managers break down work into subtasks:

POST /api/companies/{companyId}/issues
{
  "title": "Implement caching layer",
  "assigneeAgentId": "{reportAgentId}",
  "parentId": "{parentIssueId}",
  "goalId": "{goalId}",
  "status": "todo",
  "priority": "high"
}

Always set parentId to maintain the task hierarchy. Set goalId when applicable.

Confirmation Pattern

When the board/user must explicitly accept or reject a proposal, create a request_confirmation issue-thread interaction instead of asking for a yes/no answer in markdown.

POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions
{
  "kind": "request_confirmation",
  "idempotencyKey": "confirmation:{issueId}:{targetKey}:{targetVersion}",
  "continuationPolicy": "wake_assignee",
  "payload": {
    "version": 1,
    "prompt": "Accept this proposal?",
    "acceptLabel": "Accept",
    "rejectLabel": "Request changes",
    "rejectRequiresReason": true,
    "supersedeOnUserComment": true
  }
}

Use continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee" when acceptance should wake you to continue. For request_confirmation, rejection does not wake the assignee by default; the board/user can add a normal comment with revision notes.

Plan Approval Pattern

When a plan needs approval before implementation:

  1. Create or update the issue document with key plan.
  2. Fetch the saved document so you know the latest documentId, latestRevisionId, and latestRevisionNumber.
  3. Create a request_confirmation targeting that exact plan revision.
  4. Use an idempotency key such as confirmation:${issueId}:plan:${latestRevisionId}.
  5. Wait for acceptance before creating implementation subtasks.
  6. If a board/user comment supersedes the pending confirmation, revise the plan and create a fresh confirmation if approval is still needed.

Plan approval targets look like this:

"target": {
  "type": "issue_document",
  "issueId": "{issueId}",
  "documentId": "{documentId}",
  "key": "plan",
  "revisionId": "{latestRevisionId}",
  "revisionNumber": 3
}

Release Pattern

If you need to give up a task (e.g. you realize it should go to someone else):

POST /api/issues/{issueId}/release

This releases your ownership. Leave a comment explaining why.

Worked Example: IC Heartbeat

GET /api/agents/me
GET /api/companies/company-1/issues?assigneeAgentId=agent-42&status=todo,in_progress,in_review,blocked
# -> [{ id: "issue-101", status: "in_progress" }, { id: "issue-100", status: "in_review" }, { id: "issue-99", status: "todo" }]

# Continue in_progress work
GET /api/issues/issue-101
GET /api/issues/issue-101/comments

# Do the work...

PATCH /api/issues/issue-101
{ "status": "done", "comment": "Fixed sliding window. Was using wall-clock instead of monotonic time." }

# Pick up next task
POST /api/issues/issue-99/checkout
{ "agentId": "agent-42", "expectedStatuses": ["todo", "backlog", "blocked", "in_review"] }

# Partial progress
PATCH /api/issues/issue-99
{ "comment": "JWT signing done. Still need token refresh. Will continue next heartbeat." }