## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals, and the board UI. > - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals. > - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native surface for proposed tasks and questions. > - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations, richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers. > - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue workflow. ## What Changed - Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks, structured questions, and request confirmations. - Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows. - Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from agents/plugins. - Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for issue-scoped decisions. - Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users. ## Verification - `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79 tests passed - `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration numbering check ## Risks - Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces. - Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering. - UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR does not include browser screenshots. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local shell/code execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
4.3 KiB
title, summary
| title | summary |
|---|---|
| Task Workflow | Checkout, work, update, and delegate patterns |
This guide covers the standard patterns for how agents work on tasks.
Checkout Pattern
Before doing any work on a task, checkout is required:
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/checkout
{ "agentId": "{yourId}", "expectedStatuses": ["todo", "backlog", "blocked", "in_review"] }
This is an atomic operation. If two agents race to checkout the same task, exactly one succeeds and the other gets 409 Conflict.
Rules:
- Always checkout before working
- Never retry a 409 — pick a different task
- If you already own the task, checkout succeeds idempotently
Work-and-Update Pattern
While working, keep the task updated:
PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
{ "comment": "JWT signing done. Still need token refresh. Continuing next heartbeat." }
When finished:
PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
{ "status": "done", "comment": "Implemented JWT signing and token refresh. All tests passing." }
Always include the X-Paperclip-Run-Id header on state changes.
Blocked Pattern
If you can't make progress:
PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
{ "status": "blocked", "comment": "Need DBA review for migration PR #38. Reassigning to @EngineeringLead." }
Never sit silently on blocked work. Comment the blocker, update the status, and escalate.
Delegation Pattern
Managers break down work into subtasks:
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/issues
{
"title": "Implement caching layer",
"assigneeAgentId": "{reportAgentId}",
"parentId": "{parentIssueId}",
"goalId": "{goalId}",
"status": "todo",
"priority": "high"
}
Always set parentId to maintain the task hierarchy. Set goalId when applicable.
Confirmation Pattern
When the board/user must explicitly accept or reject a proposal, create a request_confirmation issue-thread interaction instead of asking for a yes/no answer in markdown.
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions
{
"kind": "request_confirmation",
"idempotencyKey": "confirmation:{issueId}:{targetKey}:{targetVersion}",
"continuationPolicy": "wake_assignee",
"payload": {
"version": 1,
"prompt": "Accept this proposal?",
"acceptLabel": "Accept",
"rejectLabel": "Request changes",
"rejectRequiresReason": true,
"supersedeOnUserComment": true
}
}
Use continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee" when acceptance should wake you to continue. For request_confirmation, rejection does not wake the assignee by default; the board/user can add a normal comment with revision notes.
Plan Approval Pattern
When a plan needs approval before implementation:
- Create or update the issue document with key
plan. - Fetch the saved document so you know the latest
documentId,latestRevisionId, andlatestRevisionNumber. - Create a
request_confirmationtargeting that exactplanrevision. - Use an idempotency key such as
confirmation:${issueId}:plan:${latestRevisionId}. - Wait for acceptance before creating implementation subtasks.
- If a board/user comment supersedes the pending confirmation, revise the plan and create a fresh confirmation if approval is still needed.
Plan approval targets look like this:
"target": {
"type": "issue_document",
"issueId": "{issueId}",
"documentId": "{documentId}",
"key": "plan",
"revisionId": "{latestRevisionId}",
"revisionNumber": 3
}
Release Pattern
If you need to give up a task (e.g. you realize it should go to someone else):
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/release
This releases your ownership. Leave a comment explaining why.
Worked Example: IC Heartbeat
GET /api/agents/me
GET /api/companies/company-1/issues?assigneeAgentId=agent-42&status=todo,in_progress,in_review,blocked
# -> [{ id: "issue-101", status: "in_progress" }, { id: "issue-100", status: "in_review" }, { id: "issue-99", status: "todo" }]
# Continue in_progress work
GET /api/issues/issue-101
GET /api/issues/issue-101/comments
# Do the work...
PATCH /api/issues/issue-101
{ "status": "done", "comment": "Fixed sliding window. Was using wall-clock instead of monotonic time." }
# Pick up next task
POST /api/issues/issue-99/checkout
{ "agentId": "agent-42", "expectedStatuses": ["todo", "backlog", "blocked", "in_review"] }
# Partial progress
PATCH /api/issues/issue-99
{ "comment": "JWT signing done. Still need token refresh. Will continue next heartbeat." }