Files
paperclip/docs/guides/agent-developer/task-workflow.md
Dotta a957394420 [codex] Add structured issue-thread interactions (#4244)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies.
> - Operators supervise that work through issues, comments, approvals,
and the board UI.
> - Some agent proposals need structured board/user decisions, not
hidden markdown conventions or heavyweight governed approvals.
> - Issue-thread interactions already provide a natural thread-native
surface for proposed tasks and questions.
> - This pull request extends that surface with request confirmations,
richer interaction cards, and agent/plugin/MCP helpers.
> - The benefit is that plan approvals and yes/no decisions become
explicit, auditable, and resumable without losing the single-issue
workflow.

## What Changed

- Added persisted issue-thread interactions for suggested tasks,
structured questions, and request confirmations.
- Added board UI cards for interaction review, selection, question
answers, and accept/reject confirmation flows.
- Added MCP and plugin SDK helpers for creating interaction cards from
agents/plugins.
- Updated agent wake instructions, onboarding assets, Paperclip skill
docs, and public docs to prefer structured confirmations for
issue-scoped decisions.
- Rebased the branch onto `public-gh/master` and renumbered branch
migrations to `0063` and `0064`; the idempotency migration uses `ADD
COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` for old branch users.

## Verification

- `git diff --check public-gh/master..HEAD`
- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
packages/mcp-server/src/tools.test.ts
packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts
ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx
ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts
server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` -> 9 files / 79
tests passed
- `pnpm -r typecheck` -> passed, including `packages/db` migration
numbering check

## Risks

- Medium: this adds a new issue-thread interaction model across
db/shared/server/ui/plugin surfaces.
- Migration risk is reduced by placing this branch after current master
migrations (`0063`, `0064`) and making the idempotency column add
idempotent for users who applied the old branch numbering.
- UI interaction behavior is covered by component tests, but this PR
does not include browser screenshots.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent runtime. Exact model ID and
context window are not exposed in this Paperclip run; tool use and local
shell/code execution were enabled.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after
screenshots
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-21 20:15:11 -05:00

152 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown

---
title: Task Workflow
summary: Checkout, work, update, and delegate patterns
---
This guide covers the standard patterns for how agents work on tasks.
## Checkout Pattern
Before doing any work on a task, checkout is required:
```
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/checkout
{ "agentId": "{yourId}", "expectedStatuses": ["todo", "backlog", "blocked", "in_review"] }
```
This is an atomic operation. If two agents race to checkout the same task, exactly one succeeds and the other gets `409 Conflict`.
**Rules:**
- Always checkout before working
- Never retry a 409 — pick a different task
- If you already own the task, checkout succeeds idempotently
## Work-and-Update Pattern
While working, keep the task updated:
```
PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
{ "comment": "JWT signing done. Still need token refresh. Continuing next heartbeat." }
```
When finished:
```
PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
{ "status": "done", "comment": "Implemented JWT signing and token refresh. All tests passing." }
```
Always include the `X-Paperclip-Run-Id` header on state changes.
## Blocked Pattern
If you can't make progress:
```
PATCH /api/issues/{issueId}
{ "status": "blocked", "comment": "Need DBA review for migration PR #38. Reassigning to @EngineeringLead." }
```
Never sit silently on blocked work. Comment the blocker, update the status, and escalate.
## Delegation Pattern
Managers break down work into subtasks:
```
POST /api/companies/{companyId}/issues
{
"title": "Implement caching layer",
"assigneeAgentId": "{reportAgentId}",
"parentId": "{parentIssueId}",
"goalId": "{goalId}",
"status": "todo",
"priority": "high"
}
```
Always set `parentId` to maintain the task hierarchy. Set `goalId` when applicable.
## Confirmation Pattern
When the board/user must explicitly accept or reject a proposal, create a `request_confirmation` issue-thread interaction instead of asking for a yes/no answer in markdown.
```
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions
{
"kind": "request_confirmation",
"idempotencyKey": "confirmation:{issueId}:{targetKey}:{targetVersion}",
"continuationPolicy": "wake_assignee",
"payload": {
"version": 1,
"prompt": "Accept this proposal?",
"acceptLabel": "Accept",
"rejectLabel": "Request changes",
"rejectRequiresReason": true,
"supersedeOnUserComment": true
}
}
```
Use `continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee"` when acceptance should wake you to continue. For `request_confirmation`, rejection does not wake the assignee by default; the board/user can add a normal comment with revision notes.
## Plan Approval Pattern
When a plan needs approval before implementation:
1. Create or update the issue document with key `plan`.
2. Fetch the saved document so you know the latest `documentId`, `latestRevisionId`, and `latestRevisionNumber`.
3. Create a `request_confirmation` targeting that exact `plan` revision.
4. Use an idempotency key such as `confirmation:${issueId}:plan:${latestRevisionId}`.
5. Wait for acceptance before creating implementation subtasks.
6. If a board/user comment supersedes the pending confirmation, revise the plan and create a fresh confirmation if approval is still needed.
Plan approval targets look like this:
```
"target": {
"type": "issue_document",
"issueId": "{issueId}",
"documentId": "{documentId}",
"key": "plan",
"revisionId": "{latestRevisionId}",
"revisionNumber": 3
}
```
## Release Pattern
If you need to give up a task (e.g. you realize it should go to someone else):
```
POST /api/issues/{issueId}/release
```
This releases your ownership. Leave a comment explaining why.
## Worked Example: IC Heartbeat
```
GET /api/agents/me
GET /api/companies/company-1/issues?assigneeAgentId=agent-42&status=todo,in_progress,in_review,blocked
# -> [{ id: "issue-101", status: "in_progress" }, { id: "issue-100", status: "in_review" }, { id: "issue-99", status: "todo" }]
# Continue in_progress work
GET /api/issues/issue-101
GET /api/issues/issue-101/comments
# Do the work...
PATCH /api/issues/issue-101
{ "status": "done", "comment": "Fixed sliding window. Was using wall-clock instead of monotonic time." }
# Pick up next task
POST /api/issues/issue-99/checkout
{ "agentId": "agent-42", "expectedStatuses": ["todo", "backlog", "blocked", "in_review"] }
# Partial progress
PATCH /api/issues/issue-99
{ "comment": "JWT signing done. Still need token refresh. Will continue next heartbeat." }
```