Update CSS tests to revision 0698c2aa9ead844b6d7d10eafb096cb1118e13ef

This commit is contained in:
Ms2ger
2015-12-09 01:48:05 -05:00
parent 9aa1b1e408
commit 35c74aecc2
11290 changed files with 92400 additions and 49214 deletions

View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
<head>
<title>CSS Test: Absolutely positioned, non-replaced elements, over-constrained</title>
<link rel="author" title="Microsoft" href="http://www.microsoft.com/">
<link rel="reviewer" title="Gérard Talbot" href="http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/"> <!-- 2012-08-27 -->
<link rel="reviewer" title="Gérard Talbot" href="http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/"> <!-- 2012-08-27 -->
<link rel="help" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#abs-non-replaced-height">
<link rel="match" href="reference/absolute-non-replaced-height-006-ref.htm">
@@ -36,31 +36,31 @@
/*
50px : top
+
+
50px : margin-top
+
+
0 : border-top-width
+
+
0 : padding-top
+
+
150px : height
+
0 : padding-bottom
+
+
0 : border-bottom-width
+
+
50px : margin-bottom
+
50px : bottom
=============
350px while the height of containing block is only 300px.
So, here we definitely have an overconstrained situation. In which
350px while the height of containing block is only 300px.
So, here we definitely have an overconstrained situation. In which
case the spec clearly states
"If the values are over-constrained, ignore the value for 'bottom'
"If the values are over-constrained, ignore the value for 'bottom'
and solve for that value."
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#abs-non-replaced-height
So, here, the used value for bottom will be 0px so that the equation
gets balanced.