At the root of an inline formatting context, we used its vertical-align
in order to compute the strut. That was wrong, since vertical-align
on a block container shouldn't affect the contents, it should only
affect the alignment of the block container (if it's inline-level)
within the parent IFC.
This was only working well if the block container was block-level, since
effective_vertical_align_for_inline_layout returned `baseline` for
block-level boxes.
Instead of the outer display type, this patch changes the logic to check
whether we are at the root of the IFC.
Instead of using the border widths from the style, use the ones recorded
by the `BoxFragment`. This is necessary because inline layout can
override these border widths during fragmentation. For instance, when a
box is split across two lines only one fragment should have an inline
start border.
* layout: Implement support for `line-height` and `vertical-align`
This is an initial implementation of proper `line-height` and
`vertical-align` support. While this change includes the bulk of the
work there are still many missing pieces for full support. In particular
some big missing things are:
- Flex containers do not properly compute their baselines. The idea is
to tackle this in a followup change. This causes various flex tests
to start failing because everything used to be top aligned.
- The implementation of the line-height quirks (only active in quirks
mode) are incomplete. While the quirk works in many cases, there are
still some cases where it is handled incorrectly. This requires more
redesign and refinement, better suited for a followup.
- Most of the features are CSS 3 such as precision control of the
baseline and first and last baselines are not implemented. This
change gets us close to CSS 2.x support.
While there are many new test passes with this change some tests are
starting to fail. An accounting of new failures:
Tests failing also in Layout 2013:
- /css/css2/positioning/toogle-abspos-on-relpos-inline-child.html (only passes in Chrome)
- /css/CSS2/fonts/font-applies-to-001.xht (potentially an issue with font size)
Invalid tests:
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-003.xht
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-004.xht
- These are are failing in all browsers. See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1222151.
Missing table support:
- /_mozilla/mozilla/table_valign_middle.html
Missing `font-size-adjust` support :
- /css/css-fonts/font-size-adjust-zero-2.html (also failing in 2013)
Incomplete form field support :
- /html/rendering/widgets/the-select-element/option-add-label-quirks.html (label isn't rendered so button isn't the right size in quirks mode due to line height quirk)
Need support for calculating flexbox baseline:
- /css/css-flexbox/fieldset-baseline-alignment.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flex-inline.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-multi-line-horiz-001.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001a.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001b.html
Failing because we don't create anonymous inline boxes for text children of blocks:
- /css/CSS2/linebox/anonymous-inline-inherit-001.html
Passes locally (potentially related to fonts):
- /css/CSS2/css1/c414-flt-fit-004.xht
- /css/css-transforms/transform-input-017.html
- /html/obsolete/requirements-for-implementations/the-marquee-element-0/marquee-min-intrinsic-size.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-005.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-006.html
* Some cleanups after live review with @mukilan
Also update results.
* Update web-platform-tests to revision b'dd47ca67f55ac9df45235b2335200fb885dd1357'
* Update test expectations
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Improve the calculation of the block size of line boxes and all their
component elements. Even empty spans can increase the size of the line
based on their font-size. Elements that have a line-height should
increase the block size of the line, but that setting should not effect
their own size.
In addition to the new passes there are some new failures
Failing because a progression exposes the real issue these tests are
testing:
- css/css-color/t32-opacity-offscreen-multiple-boxes-1-c.xht
- css/css-color/t32-opacity-offscreen-multiple-boxes-2-c.xht
Likely failing because of vertical-align and another sizing issue:
- css/css-transforms/perspective-untransformable-no-stacking-context.html
Failing because a progression reveals another failure:
- html/rendering/non-replaced-elements/hidden-elements.html
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
* Add initial support for css-text-3 whitespace handling
This adds initial support for whitespace handling from the CSS
specification for Layout 2020. In general, the basics are covered. Since
test output is very sensitive to whitespace handling, this change
incorporates several fixes:
1. Whitespace is collapsed according to the Phase 1 rules of the
specification, though language-specific unbreaking rules are not
handled properly yet.
2. Whitespace is mostly trimmed and positioned according to the Phase 2
rules, but full support for removing whitespace at the end of lines
is pending on a temporary data structure to hold lines under
construction.
3. Completely empty box fragments left over immediately after line
breaks are now trimmed from the fragment tree.
4. This change tries to detect when an inline formatting context
collapses through.
Fixes#29994.
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <me@mukilan.in>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Update test results
---------
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <me@mukilan.in>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
