Narfinger e64c53972a Switch the majority of fxhash uses to rustc_hash which is maintained (#39168) ...

fxhash seems to be unmaintained (see
https://github.com/rustsec/advisory-db/issues/2185) so we should move
away from it.
Additionally, the new crate might be slightly faster.

There is still some cases depending on stylo that have the old fxhash
crate.

Signed-off-by: Narfinger <Narfinger@users.noreply.github.com>

Testing: Changes in Hash should really not show any bugs. And
performance should be comparable.

Signed-off-by: Narfinger <Narfinger@users.noreply.github.com>

2025-09-06 05:19:47 +00:00

..

Cargo.toml

Switch the majority of fxhash uses to rustc_hash which is maintained (#39168)

2025-09-06 05:19:47 +00:00

layout_damage.rs

layout: Separate LayoutDamage bit patterns nibbles with _ (#38476)

2025-08-05 12:43:16 +00:00

lib.rs

Switch the majority of fxhash uses to rustc_hash which is maintained (#39168)

2025-09-06 05:19:47 +00:00

wrapper_traits.rs

cargo: Bump rustc to 1.89 (#36818)

2025-08-19 11:07:53 +00:00