* docs(resilience): PR 5.3 — foodWater scorer audit (construct-deterministic GCC identity) PR 5.3 of cohort-audit plan 2026-04-24-002. Stacked on PR 5.2 (#3373) so the known-limitations.md section append is additive. Read-only static audit of scoreFoodWater. Findings 1. The observed GCC-all-score-53 is CONSTRUCT-DETERMINISTIC, not a regional-default leak. Pinned mathematically: - IPC/HDX doesn't publish active food-crisis data for food-secure states → scorer's fao-null branch imputes IMPUTE.ipcFood=88 (class='stable-absence', cov=0.7) at combined weight 0.6 - WB indicator ER.H2O.FWST.ZS (labelled 'water stress') for GCC is EXTREME (KW ~3200%, BH ~3400%, UAE ~2080%, QA ~770%) — all clamp to sub-score 0 under the scorer's lower-better 0..100 normaliser at weight 0.4 - Blended with peopleInCrisis=0 (fao block present with zero): (100 * 0.45 + 0 * 0.4) / (0.45 + 0.4) = 45 / 0.85 ≈ 53 Every GCC country has the same inputs → same outputs. That's construct math, not a regional lookup. 2. Indicator-keyword routing is code-correct. `'water stress'`, `'withdrawal'`, `'dependency'` route to lower-better; `'availability'`, `'renewable'`, `'access'` route to higher-better; unrecognized indicators fall through to a value-range heuristic with a WARN log. 3. No bug or methodology decision required. The 53-all-GCC output is a correct summary statement: "non-crisis food security + severe water-withdrawal stress." A future construct decision might split foodWater into separate food and water dims so one saturated sub-signal doesn't dominate the combined dim for desert economies — but that's a construct redesign, not a bug. Shipped - `docs/methodology/known-limitations.md` — extended with a new section documenting the foodWater audit findings, the exact blend math that yields ~53 for GCC, cohort-determinism vs regional-default, and a follow-up data-side spot-check list gated on API-key access. - `tests/resilience-foodwater-field-mapping.test.mts` — 8 new regression-guard tests: 1. indicator='water stress' routes to lower-better 2. GCC extreme-withdrawal anchor (value=2000 → blended score 53) 3. indicator='renewable water availability' routes to higher-better 4. fao=null with static record → imputes 88; imputationClass=null because observed AQUASTAT wins (weightedBlend T1.7 rule) 5. fully-imputed (fao=null + aquastat=null) surfaces imputationClass='stable-absence' 6. static-record absent entirely → coverage=0, NOT impute 7. Cohort determinism — identical inputs → identical scores 8. Different water-profile inputs → different scores (rules out regional-default hypothesis) Verified - `npx tsx --test tests/resilience-foodwater-field-mapping.test.mts` — 8 pass / 0 fail - `npm run test:data` — 6711 pass / 0 fail (PR 5.2's 9 + PR 5.3's 8 = 17 new stacked) - `npm run typecheck` / `typecheck:api` — green - `npm run lint` / `lint:md` — clean * fix(resilience): PR 5.3 review — pin IMPUTE branch for GCC anchor; fix comment math Addresses 3 P2 Greptile findings on #3374 — all variations of the same root cause: the test fixture + doc described two different code paths that coincidentally both produce ~53 for GCC inputs. Changes 1. GCC anchor test now drives the IMPUTE branch (`fao: null`), matching what the static seeder emits for GCC in production. The else branch (`fao: { peopleInCrisis: 0 }`) happens to converge on ~52.94 by coincidence but is NOT the live code path for GCC. 2. Doc finding #4 updated to show the IMPUTE-branch math `(88×0.6 + 0×0.4) / 1.0 = 52.8 → 53` and explicitly notes the else-branch convergence as a coincidence — not the construct's intent. 3. Comment math off-by-one fix at line 107: (88×0.6 + 80×0.4) / (0.6+0.4) = 52.8 + 32.0 = 84.8 → 85 (was incorrectly stated as 85.6 → 86) Test assertion `>= 80 && <= 90` still accepts 85 so behaviour is unchanged; this was a comment-only error that would have misled anyone reproducing the math by hand. Verified - `npx tsx --test tests/resilience-foodwater-field-mapping.test.mts` — 8 pass / 0 fail (IMPUTE-branch anchor test produces 53 as expected) - `npm run lint:md` — clean Also rebased onto updated #3373 (which landed a backtick-escape fix).
World Monitor
Real-time global intelligence dashboard — AI-powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface.
Documentation · Releases · Contributing
What It Does
- 500+ curated news feeds across 15 categories, AI-synthesized into briefs
- Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with 45 data layers
- Cross-stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence
- Country Intelligence Index — composite risk scoring across 12 signal categories
- Finance radar — 92 stock exchanges, commodities, crypto, and 7-signal market composite
- Local AI — run everything with Ollama, no API keys required
- 5 site variants from a single codebase (world, tech, finance, commodity, happy)
- Native desktop app (Tauri 2) for macOS, Windows, and Linux
- 21 languages with native-language feeds and RTL support
For the full feature list, architecture, data sources, and algorithms, see the documentation.
Quick Start
git clone https://github.com/koala73/worldmonitor.git
cd worldmonitor
npm install
npm run dev
Open localhost:5173. No environment variables required for basic operation.
For variant-specific development:
npm run dev:tech # tech.worldmonitor.app
npm run dev:finance # finance.worldmonitor.app
npm run dev:commodity # commodity.worldmonitor.app
npm run dev:happy # happy.worldmonitor.app
See the self-hosting guide for deployment options (Vercel, Docker, static).
Tech Stack
| Category | Technologies |
|---|---|
| Frontend | Vanilla TypeScript, Vite, globe.gl + Three.js, deck.gl + MapLibre GL |
| Desktop | Tauri 2 (Rust) with Node.js sidecar |
| AI/ML | Ollama / Groq / OpenRouter, Transformers.js (browser-side) |
| API Contracts | Protocol Buffers (92 protos, 22 services), sebuf HTTP annotations |
| Deployment | Vercel Edge Functions (60+), Railway relay, Tauri, PWA |
| Caching | Redis (Upstash), 3-tier cache, CDN, service worker |
Full stack details in the architecture docs.
Flight Data
Flight data provided gracefully by Wingbits, the most advanced ADS-B flight data solution.
Data Sources
WorldMonitor aggregates 65+ external data sources across geopolitics, finance, energy, climate, aviation, cyber, military, infrastructure, and news intelligence. See the full data sources catalog for providers, feed tiers, and collection methods.
Contributing
Contributions welcome! See CONTRIBUTING.md for guidelines.
npm run typecheck # Type checking
npm run build:full # Production build
License
AGPL-3.0 for non-commercial use. Commercial license required for any commercial use.
| Use Case | Allowed? |
|---|---|
| Personal / research / educational | Yes |
| Self-hosted (non-commercial) | Yes, with attribution |
| Fork and modify (non-commercial) | Yes, share source under AGPL-3.0 |
| Commercial use / SaaS / rebranding | Requires commercial license |
See LICENSE for full terms. For commercial licensing, contact the maintainer.
Copyright (C) 2024-2026 Elie Habib. All rights reserved.
Author
Elie Habib — GitHub
Contributors
Security Acknowledgments
We thank the following researchers for responsibly disclosing security issues:
- Cody Richard — Disclosed three security findings covering IPC command exposure, renderer-to-sidecar trust boundary analysis, and fetch patch credential injection architecture (2026)
See our Security Policy for responsible disclosure guidelines.
worldmonitor.app · docs.worldmonitor.app · finance.worldmonitor.app · commodity.worldmonitor.app
